Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statement on advancing the assessment of chemical mixtures and their risks for human health and the environment

Open access
Drakvik, Elina, Altenburger, Rolf, Aoki, Yasunobu, Backhaus, Thomas, Bahadori, Tina, Barouki, Robert, Brack, Werner, Cronin, Mark T.D., Demeneix, Barbara, Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne, van Klaveren, Jacob, Kneuer, Carsten, Kolossa-Gehring, Marike, Lebret, Erik, Posthuma, Leo, Reiber, Lena, Rider, Cynthia, Rüegg, Joëlle, Testa, Giuseppe, van der Burg, Bart, van der Voet, Hilko, Warhurst, A. Michael, van de Water, Bob, Yamazaki, Kunihiko, Öberg, Mattias, Bergman, Åke·2020·Environment International

Abstract

The number of anthropogenic chemicals, manufactured, by-products, metabolites and abiotically formed transformation products, counts to hundreds of thousands, at present. Thus, humans and wildlife are exposed to complex mixtures, never one chemical at a time and rarely with only one dominating effect. Hence there is an urgent need to develop strategies on how exposure to multiple hazardous chemicals and the combination of their effects can be assessed. A workshop, “Advancing the Assessment of Chemical Mixtures and their Risks for Human Health and the Environment” was organized in May 2018 together with Joint Research Center in Ispra, EU-funded research projects and Commission Services and relevant EU agencies. This forum for researchers and policy-makers was created to discuss and identify gaps in risk assessment and governance of chemical mixtures as well as to discuss state of the art science and future research needs. Based on the presentations and discussions at this workshop we want to bring forward the following Key Messages: We are at a turning point: multiple exposures and their combined effects require better management to protect public health and the environment from hazardous chemical mixtures. Regulatory initiatives should be launched to investigate the opportunities for all relevant regulatory frameworks to include prospective mixture risk assessment and consider combined exposures to (real-life) chemical mixtures to humans and wildlife, across sectors. Precautionary approaches and intermediate measures (e.g. Mixture Assessment Factor) can already be applied, although, definitive mixture risk assessments cannot be routinely conducted due to significant knowledge and data gaps. A European strategy needs to be set, through stakeholder engagement, for the governance of combined exposure to multiple chemicals and mixtures. The strategy would include research aimed at scientific advancement in mechanistic understanding and modelling techniques, as well as research to address regulatory and policy needs. Without such a clear strategy, specific objectives and common priorities, research, and policies to address mixtures will likely remain scattered and insufficient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105267

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. EC, European Commission, 2018b. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee: Commission General Report on the operation of REACH and review of certain elements Conclusions and Actions. COM(2018)/0116 final (Accessed September 30, 2019).
  2. ECHA, European Chemicals Agency, 2016. New Approach Methodologies in Regulatory Science. Proceedings of a scientific workshop Helsinki, 19–20 April 2016. <https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/21838212/scientific_ws_proceedings_en.pdf/a2087434-0407-4705-9057-95d9c2c2cc57> (Accessed September 30, 2019).
  3. Gennings, 2018, Incorporating regulatory guideline values in analysis of epidemiology data, Environ. Int., 120, 535, 10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.039 · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.039
  4. Lebret, 2015, Integrated environmental health impact assessment for risk governance purposes; across what do we integrate?, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 13, 10.3390/ijerph13010071 · doi:10.3390/ijerph13010071
  5. Petersen, A.C., van Asselt, M.B.A., 2008. Conclusions and recommendations. In: Mathijssen, J., Petersen, A.C., Besseling, P., Rahman, A., Don, H. (Eds.). Dealing with Uncertainty in Policymaking: The Hague/Bilthoven/Leiden: CPB/PBL/Rand Europe.

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Drakvik, E., Altenburger, R., Aoki, Y., Backhaus, T., Bahadori, T., Barouki, R., Brack, W., Cronin, M. T. D., Demeneix, B., Hougaard Bennekou, S., van Klaveren, J., Kneuer, C., Kolossa-Gehring, M., Lebret, E., Posthuma, L., Reiber, L., Rider, C., Rüegg, J., Testa, G., van der Burg, B., van der Voet, H., Warhurst, A. M., van de Water, B., Yamazaki, K., Öberg, M., & Bergman, Å.
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
134
Pages
105267
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984957779
Cited by
268
References
17
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ZIA ES103316-02)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statement on advancing the assessment of chemical mixtures and their risks for human health and the environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105267
The paper
Drakvik, E., Altenburger, R., Aoki, Y., Backhaus, T., Bahadori, T., Barouki, R., Brack, W., Cronin, M. T. D., Demeneix, B., Hougaard Bennekou, S., van Klaveren, J., Kneuer, C., Kolossa-Gehring, M., Lebret, E., Posthuma, L., Reiber, L., Rider, C., Rüegg, J., Testa, G., . . . Bergman, Å. (2020). Statement on advancing the assessment of chemical mixtures and their risks for human health and the environment. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105267

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.