The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regulatory assessment of chemical mixtures: Requirements, current approaches and future perspectives
Open accessAbstract
This paper reviews regulatory requirements and recent case studies to illustrate how the risk assessment (RA) of chemical mixtures is conducted, considering both the effects on human health and on the environment. A broad range of chemicals, regulations and RA methodologies are covered, in order to identify mixtures of concern, gaps in the regulatory framework, data needs, and further work to be carried out. Also the current and potential future use of novel tools (Adverse Outcome Pathways, in silico tools, toxicokinetic modelling, etc.) in the RA of combined effects were reviewed. The assumptions made in the RA, predictive model specifications and the choice of toxic reference values can greatly influence the assessment outcome, and should therefore be specifically justified. Novel tools could support mixture RA mainly by providing a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of combined effects. Nevertheless, their use is currently limited because of a lack of guidance, data, and expertise. More guidance is needed to facilitate their application. As far as the authors are aware, no prospective RA concerning chemicals related to various regulatory sectors has been performed to date, even though numerous chemicals are registered under several regulatory frameworks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Overview of known plastic packaging-associated chemicals and their hazards
Groh, K. J., Backhaus, T., Carney-Almroth, B., Geueke, B., Inostroza, P. A., Lennquist, A., Leslie, H. A., Maffini, M., Slunge, D., Trasande, L., et al. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.015 · Cited by 913
EFSA Scientific Committee, More, S. J., Bampidis, V., Benford, D., Bennekou, S. H., Bragard, C., Halldorsson, T. I., Hernández‐Jerez, A. F., Koutsoumanis, K., Naegeli, H., et al. (2019) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5634 · Cited by 574
Risks of Plastic Debris: Unravelling Fact, Opinion, Perception, and Belief
Koelmans, A. A., Besseling, E., Foekema, E., Kooi, M., Mintenig, S., Ossendorp, B. C., Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E., Verschoor, A., van Wezel, A. P., & Scheffer, M. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b02219 · Cited by 381
Zhou, S., Di Paolo, C., Wu, X., Shao, Y., Seiler, T.-B., & Hollert, H. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.034 · Cited by 360
Drakvik, E., Altenburger, R., Aoki, Y., Backhaus, T., Bahadori, T., Barouki, R., Brack, W., Cronin, M. T. D., Demeneix, B., Hougaard Bennekou, S., et al. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105267 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Kienzler, A., Bopp, S. K., van der Linden, S., Berggren, E., & Worth, A.
- Venue
- Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 80
- Pages
- 321-334
- ISSN
- 0273-2300 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2406870242
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulatory assessment of chemical mixtures: Requirements, current approaches and future perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.020
- The paper
- Kienzler, A., Bopp, S. K., van der Linden, S., Berggren, E., & Worth, A. (2016). Regulatory assessment of chemical mixtures: Requirements, current approaches and future perspectives. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.