CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 99Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsWastewater Treatment and ReuseAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Amendment soil with biochar to control antibiotic resistance genes under unconventional water resources irrigation: Proceed with caution

Cui, Er-Ping, Gao, Feng, Liu, Yuan, Fan, Xiang-Yang, Li, Zhong-Yang, Du, Zhen-Jie, Hu, Chao, Neal, Andrew L.·2018·Environmental Pollution
DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.143
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) has become a cause for serious concern because of its potential risk to public health. The use of unconventional water resources (e.g., reclaimed water or piggery wastewater) in agriculture to relieve groundwater shortages may result in an accumulation of ARGs in soil. Biochar addition has been proven to be a beneficial method to alleviate the pollution of ARGs in manure-amended soil. However, the role of biochar on ARGs in soil-plant systems repeatedly irrigated with unconventional water resources is unknown. Under reclaimed water or piggery wastewater irrigation, rhizobox experiments using maize plants in soil amended with biochar were conducted to investigate the variation of typical ARGs (tet and sul genes) in soil-plant systems during a 60-day cultivation, and ARGs was characterized by high-throughput qPCR with a 48 (assays) × 108 (samples) array. Only piggery wastewater irrigation significantly increased the abundance of ARGs in rhizosphere and bulk soils and root endophytes. Following 30-day cultivation, the abundance of ARGs in soil was significantly lower due to biochar addition. However, by day 60, the abundance of ARGs in soil supplemented with biochar was significantly higher than in the control soils. Antibiotics, bio-available heavy metals, nutrients, bacterial community, and mobile gene elements (MGEs) were detected and analyzed to find factors shaping ARGs dynamics. The behavior of ARGs were associated with anti…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.143

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Barker-Reid, 2010, Occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes in reclaimed water and river water in the Werribee Basin, Australia, J. Water Health, 8, 521, 10.2166/wh.2010.102 · DOI
  2. Cantrell, 2009, Bioenergy from Coastal bermudagrass receiving subsurface drip irrigation with advance-treated swine wastewater, Bioresour. Technol., 100, 3285, 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.070 · DOI
  3. Chee-Sanford, 2009, Fate and transport of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes following land application of manure waste, J. Environ. Qual., 38, 1086, 10.2134/jeq2008.0128 · DOI
  4. Chen, 2018, Effect of biochar amendment on the alleviation of antibiotic resistance in soil and phyllosphere of Brassica chinensis L, Soil Biol. Biochem., 119, 74, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.015 · DOI
  5. Chen, 2015, Impact of reclaimed water irrigation on soil health in urban green areas, Chemosphere, 119, 654, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.035 · DOI
  6. Cheng, 2016, Behavior of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in eco-agricultural system: a case study, J. Hazard Mater., 304, 18, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.037 · DOI
  7. Cui, 2016, Effect of different biochars on antibiotic resistance genes and bacterial community during chicken manure composting, Bioresour. Technol., 203, 11, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.030 · DOI
  8. Duan, 2017, Effects of biochar on reducing the abundance of oxytetracycline, antibiotic resistance genes, and human pathogenic bacteria in soil and lettuce, Environ. Pollut., 224, 787, 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Eisen, 1998, Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95, 14863, 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fahrenfeld, 2013, Reclaimed water as a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes: distribution system and irrigation implications, Front. Microbiol., 4, 130, 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00130 · DOI
  11. Gottel, 2011, Distinct microbial communities within the endosphere and rhizosphere of Populus deltoides roots across contrasting soil types, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 77, 5934, 10.1128/AEM.05255-11 · DOI
  12. Gatica, 2013, Impact of treated wastewater irrigation on antibiotic resistance in the soil microbiome, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 20, 3529, 10.1007/s11356-013-1505-4 · DOI
  13. Hong, 2013, Monitoring the perturbation of soil and groundwater microbial communities due to pig production activities, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 79, 2620, 10.1128/AEM.03760-12 · DOI
  14. Huang, 2015, Adaptively evolving bacterial communities for complete and selective reduction of Cr(VI), Cu(II), and Cd(II) in biocathode bioelectrochemical systems, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 9914, 10.1021/acs.est.5b00191 · DOI
  15. Kang, 2016, Impacts of supplementing chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers manufactured using pig manure as a substrate on the spread of tetracycline resistance genes in soil, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 130, 279, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.04.028 · DOI
  16. Kopmann, 2013, Abundance and transferability of antibiotic resistance as related to the fate of sulfadiazine in maize rhizosphere and bulk soil. FEMS, Microb. Ecol., 83, 125, 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01458.x · DOI
  17. Masud, 2014, Hydroxyl release by maize (Zea mays L.) roots under acidic conditions due to nitrate absorption and its potential to ameliorate an acidic Ultisol, J. Soils Sediments, 14, 845, 10.1007/s11368-013-0837-5 · DOI
  18. Martin, 2012, Marked changes in herbicide sorption-desorption upon ageing of biochars in soil, J. Hazard Mater., 231–232, 70, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.06.040 · DOI
  19. Negreanu, 2012, Impact of treated wastewater irrigation on antibiotic resistance in agricultural soils, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 4800, 10.1021/es204665b · DOI
  20. Ouyang, 2015, Increased levels of antibiotic resistance in urban stream of Jiulongjiang River, China, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 99, 5697, 10.1007/s00253-015-6416-5 · DOI
  21. Peiris, 2017, Biochar based removal of antibiotic sulfonamides and tetracyclines in aquatic environments: a critical review, Bioresour. Technol., 246, 150, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.150 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rahube, 2014, Impact of fertilizing with raw or anaerobically digested sewage sludge on the abundance of antibiotic-resistant coliforms, antibiotic resistance genes, and pathogenic bacteria in soil and on vegetables at harvest, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 80, 6898, 10.1128/AEM.02389-14 · DOI
  23. Rajapaksha, 2014, Invasive plant-derived biochar inhibits sulfamethazine uptake by lettuce in soil, Chemosphere, 111, 500, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.040 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Sui, 2016, Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in anaerobic digestion and land application of swine wastewater, Environ. Pollut., 213, 751, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.038 · DOI
  25. Wang, 2014, High throughput profiling of antibiotic resistance genes in urban park soils with reclaimed water irrigation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 9079, 10.1021/es502615e · DOI
  26. Wang, 2015, Antibiotic resistance genes in manure-amended soil and vegetables at harvest, J. Hazard Mater., 299, 215, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.028 · DOI
  27. Waldron, 2009, The significance of organic carbon and nutrient export from peatland-dominated landscapes subject to disturbance, a stoichiometric perspective, Biogeosciences, 6, 363, 10.5194/bg-6-363-2009 · DOI
  28. Xie, 2016, Changes in antibiotic concentrations and antibiotic resistome during commercial composting of animal manures, Environ. Pollut., 219, 182, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.044 · DOI
  29. Xu, 2016, High-throughput profiling of antibiotic resistance genes in drinking water treatment plants and distribution systems, Environ. Pollut., 213, 119, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.02.013 · DOI
  30. Yang, 2017, Comparative analysis of bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere of maize by high-throughput pyrosequencing, PLoS One, 12
  31. Yang, 2013, Growth dynamics of Chinese wingnut (Pterocarya stenoptera) seedlings and its effects on soil chemical properties under simulated water change in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region of Yangtze River, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 20, 7112, 10.1007/s11356-013-1878-4 · DOI
  32. Ye, 2016, Effect of biochar amendment on the control of soil sulfonamides, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and gene enrichment in lettuce tissues, J. Hazard Mater., 309, 219, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.074 · DOI
  33. Zhang, 2016, Effects of adding different surfactants on antibiotic resistance genes and intI1 during chicken manure composting, Bioresour. Technol., 219, 545, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.117 · DOI
  34. Zhang, 2012, Insights into aquatic toxicities of the antibiotics oxytetracycline and ciprofloxacin in the presence of metal: complexation versus mixture, Environ. Pollut., 166, 48, 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.03.009 · DOI
  35. Zheng, 2017, Antibiotic resistome promotion in drinking water during biological activated carbon treatment: is it influenced by quorum sensing?, Sci. Total Environ., 612, 1, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.072 · DOI
  36. Zheng, 2018, High-throughput profiling of seasonal variations of antibiotic resistance gene transport in a peri-urban river, Environ. Int., 114, 87, 10.1016/j.envint.2018.02.039 · DOI
  37. Zhu, 2017, Does organically produced lettuce harbor higher abundance of antibiotic resistance genes than conventionally produced?, Environ. Int., 98, 152, 10.1016/j.envint.2016.11.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cui, E.-P., Gao, F., Liu, Y., Fan, X.-Y., Li, Z.-Y., Du, Z.-J., Hu, C., & Neal, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Gao, Feng
ORCID
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
240
Pages
475-484
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.143
OpenAlex
W2801104987
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, CAAS) (FIRI2017-14)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51479201, 41701265)
  • Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province (172102110121)
  • Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP) of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  • BBSRC-funded Soil to Nutrition strategic programme (BBS/E/C/000I0310)
  • Natural Environment Research Council
  • BBSRC
  • Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Systems research programme (NE/N018125/1 LTS-M)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Keywords
antibiotic resistance genes, biochar, non-conventional water resources, irrigation water reuse, soil-plant system, rhizosphere, root endophytes, tet genes, sul genes, mobile genetic elements, available phosphorus, soil bacterial communities, maize
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteria, Charcoal, Zea mays, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Genes, Bacterial, Manure, Phosphorus, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Interspersed Repetitive Sequences, Rhizosphere, Wastewater, Water Resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review