Cited by 34Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Combined spatial and retrospective analysis of fluoroalkyl chemicals in fluvial sediments reveal changes in levels and patterns over the last 40 years

Open access
Mourier, B., Labadie, P., Desmet, M., Grosbois, C., Raux, J., Debret, M., Copard, Y., Pardon, P. +2 more·2019·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Bed sediments and a dated sediment core were collected upstream and downstream from the city of Lyon (France) to assess the spatial and temporal trends of contamination by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in this section of the Rhône River. Upstream from Lyon, concentrations of total PFASs (ΣPFASs) in sediments are low (between 0.19 and 2.6 ng g-1 dry weight - dw), being characterized by a high proportion of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). Downstream from Lyon, and also from a fluoropolymer manufacturing plant, ΣPFASs concentrations reach 48.7 ng g-1 dw. A gradual decrease of concentrations is reported at the coring site further downstream (38 km). Based on a dated sediment core, the temporal evolution of PFASs is reconstructed from 1984 to 2013. Prior to 1987, ΣPFASs concentrations were low (≤2 ng g-1 dw), increasing to a maximum of 51 ng g-1 dw in the 1990s and then decreasing from 2002 to the present day (∼10 ng g-1 dw). In terms of the PFAS pattern, the proportion of perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids (PFSAs) has remained stable since the 1980s (∼10%), whereas large variations are reported for carboxylic acids (PFCAs). Long chain- (C > 8) PFCAs characterized by an even number of perfluorinated carbons represent about 74% of the total PFAS load until 2005. However, from 2005 to 2013, the relative contribution of long chain- (C > 8) PFCAs with an odd number of perfluorinated carbons reaches 80%. Such changes in the PFAS pattern likely highlight a major shift in the industrial production process. This spatial and retrospective study provides valuable insights into the long-term contamination patterns of PFAS chemicals in river basins impacted by both urban and industrial activities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.079

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Temporal monitoring of fluvial sediment is limited to only two studies, both in urban environments with known point sources and differing climates.

    “For example, temporal monitoring of fluvial sediment is limited to only two studies that take place in urban environments with known point sources and differing climates.”

    From Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Surface Water and Fluvial Sediments of a Rural Gulf Coast Watershed: A Year-long Spatiotemporal Assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction (p. 4) identifies two prior studies of sediment-core temporal trends in Chinese urban rivers: Bao et al. on the Guangzhou and Huangpu and Zhao et al. on the Haihe. The Discussion (p. 16) also describes studies near industrial parks or cities. Our copy does not establish that fluvial studies were limited to only those two, that both had known point sources, or that their climates differed. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mourier, B., Labadie, P., Desmet, M., Grosbois, C., Raux, J., Debret, M., Copard, Y., Pardon, P., Budzinski, H., & Babut, M.
Affiliations
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Université de Tours (FR)
  • Laboratoire Morphodynamique Continentale et Côtière (FR)
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
Corresponding author
Mourier, B.
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
253
Issue
253
Pages
1117-1125
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2957697668
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Irstea Publications et Bases documentaires (Irstea) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • French National Research Agency
  • ANR
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS contamination, fluvial deposits, Rhône River, sediment core chronology, temporal trends, PFOS, perfluorocarboxylic acids, perfluorosulfonic acid, industrial pollution, urban pollution
MeSH terms
Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities, Carboxylic Acids, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, France, Retrospective Studies, Sulfonic Acids, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Pollution, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Geologic Sediments, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review