Cited by 9Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchPesticide Exposure and ToxicityToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) conversion from N-ethyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-perfluorooctanesulfonamide (EtFOSE) in male sprague dawley rats after inhalation exposure

Chang, Sue, Mader, Brian T., Lindstrom, Kent R., Lange, Cleston C., Hart, Jill A., Kestner, Thomas A., Schulz, Jay F., Ehresman, David J. +1 more·2017·Environmental Research

Abstract

Ethyl-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-perfluorooctanesulfonamide (EtFOSE) was one of the key building blocks for many of the perfluorooctanesulfonyl-based chemistry and laboratory studies have shown that EtFOSE can metabolically degrade to perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS). Non-occupational contribution sources to PFOS are thought to occur in general population via diets, drinking water, air and dust. For workers, however, the exposure route was mostly airborne and the exposure source was predominantly to precursor compounds such as EtFOSE. We undertook this study to investigate how much EtFOSE was converted to PFOS in the serum for male rats after 6h of exposure to EtFOSE vapor (whole body) at ambient temperature, which simulated a work place exposure scenario. There were no abnormal clinical observations and all rats gained weight during study. Interim tail-vein blood samples, collected up to 21 days after exposure, were analyzed for Et-FOSE and PFOS concentrations by LC-MS/MS. Upon inhalation exposure, the biotransformation of EtFOSE to PFOS in serum in the male rats was rapid and very little EtFOSE was detected in the serum within 24h after EtFOSE exposure. The highest conversion to PFOS in serum after exposure to EtFOSE vapor appeared to occur between Day 8-14 post exposure. Considering the potential surface and fur adsorption of test compound in the whole-body exposure system, our data would support that at least 10% of the inhaled EtFOSE was biotransformed to PFOS in the serum based…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.029

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, S., Mader, B. T., Lindstrom, K. R., Lange, C. C., Hart, J. A., Kestner, T. A., Schulz, J. F., Ehresman, D. J., & Butenhoff, J. L.
Affiliations
3M (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Sue
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
155
Pages
307-313
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2592755324
Cited by
9
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
PFOS, biotransformation, inhalation exposure, internal dosimetry, occupational exposure, perfluorinated compounds, Sprague-Dawley rats
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Animals, Biotransformation, Fluorocarbons, Male, Sulfonamides, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Alkanesulfonic Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review