Cited by 54Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchAdvancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Penetration of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate Through Rat and Human Skin In Vitro

Fasano, W. J., Kennedy, G. L., Szostek, B., Farrar, D. G., Ward, R. J., Haroun, L., Hinderliter, P. M.·2005·Drug and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

Rat and human epidermal membranes were mounted onto in vitro diffusion cells with an exposure area of 0.64 cm2, and skin integrity was confirmed using electrical impedance. Following membrane selection, Fluorad FC-118, a 20% aqueous solution of ammonium perfluorooctanoate (AFPO), was applied to the epidermal surface of each skin replicate at approximately 150 microL/cm2 and the donor chamber opening occluded with Parafilm. Serial receptor fluid samples were collected hourly from 1 to 6 h and at 12, 24, 30, and 48 h and analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for APFO anion (PFO-). For rat skin, the time to steady-state penetration (6500+/-3000 ng APFO x cm(-2) x h(-1)) occurred in less than 12 h, which was sustained until termination (48 h). Based on the concentration of the applied test material, the permeability coefficient (Kp) for APFO in rat skin was calculated to be 3.25+/-1.51 x 10(-5) cm/h. By end of the 48-h exposure period, only a small portion of the total APFO applied (1.44+/-1.13%) had penetrated through rat skin. For human skin, steady-state penetration of APFO (190+/-57 ng APFO x cm(-2) x h(-1)) was reached by 12 h. Based on the concentration of the applied test material, the permeability coefficient for APFO in human skin was calculated to be 9.49+/-2.86 x 10(-7) cm/h. By the end of the 48-h exposure period, only a negligible amount of the total APFO applied (0.048+/-0.01%) had penetrated through human skin. Thus, under infinite dose and occlusive conditions, the steady-state penetration of APFO from a 20% solution was approximately 34-fold faster through rat skin than human skin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/dct-39707

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fasano, W. J., Kennedy, G. L., Szostek, B., Farrar, D. G., Ward, R. J., Haroun, L., & Hinderliter, P. M.
Affiliations
  • DuPont (United States) (US)
  • Ineos (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Syngenta (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Drug and Chemical Toxicology
Published
2005-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
79-90
ISSN
  • 0148-0545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-6014
OpenAlex
W2087195411
Cited by
54
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
ammonium perfluorooctanoate, perfluorinated compounds, skin permeation, rat skin, human skin
MeSH terms
Animals, Caprylates, Epidermis, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Kinetics, Permeability, Skin Absorption, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review