Does biochar accelerate the mitigation of greenhouse gaseous emissions from agricultural soil? - A global meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Greenhouse gaseous (GHGs) emissions from cropland soils are one of the major contributors to global warming. However, the extent and pattern of these climatic breakdowns are usally determined by the management practices in-place. The use of biochar on cropland soils holds a great promise for increasing the overall crop productivity. Nevertheless, biochar application to agricultural soils has grown in popularity as a strategy to off-set the negative feedback associated with agriculture GHGs emissions, i.e., CO 2 (carbon dioxide), CH 4 (methane), and N 2 O (nitrous oxide). Despite increasing efforts to uncover the potential of biochar to mitigate the farmland GHGs effects, there has been little synthesis of how different types of biochar affect GHGs fluxes from cropland soils under varied experimental conditions. Here, we presented a meta-analysis of the interactions between biochar and GHGs emissions across global cropland soils, with field experiments showing the strongest GHG mitigation potential, i.e. CO 2 (RR = -0.108) and CH 4 (RR = -0.399). The biochar pyrolysis temperature, feedstock, C: N ratio, and pH were also found to be important factors influencing GHGs emissions. A prominent reduction in N 2 O (RR = -0.13) and CH 4 (RR = -1.035) emissions was observed in neutral soils (pH = 6.6-7.3), whereas acidic soils (pH ≤ 6.5) accounted for the strongest mitigation effect on CO 2 compared to N 2 O and CH 4 emissions. We also found that a biochar application rate of 30 t ha-1 was best for mitigating GHGs emissions while achieving optimal crop yield. According to our meta-analysis, maize crop receiving biochar amendment showed a significant mitigation potential for CO 2, N 2 O, and CH 4 emissions. On the other hand, the use of biochar had shown significant impact on the global warming potential (GWP) of total GHGs emissions. The current data synthesis takes the lead in analyzing emissions status and mitigation potential for three of the most common GHGs from cropland soils and demonstrates that biochar application can significantly reduce the emissions budget from agriculture.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wood biochars possessed highest potential to mitigate CH4 emissions (-1.198), followed by biosolids (-0.544) and herbaceous (-0.263) biochars.
“Wood biochars possessed highest potential to mitigate CH 4 emissions ( -1.198), followed by biosolids ( -0.544) and herbaceous ( -0.263) biochars (Shakoor et al. 2021).”
From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Shakoor et al. 2021
The meta-analysis by Shakoor et al. (2021) suggested that neutral soil pH (6.6 ~ 7.3) favored CH4 emission mitigation, whereas an acidic nature of the amended soil promoted CH4 emissions following biochar application.
“The meta-analysis by Shakoor et al. (2021) also suggested that neutral soil pH (6.6 ~ 7.3) favored CH4 emission mitigation, whereas an acidic nature of the amended soil promoted CH 4 emissions following biochar application (Shakoor et al. 2021).”
From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Shakoor et al. (2021)
The meta-analysis by Shakoor et al. (2021) suggested that biochar application was more effective for CH4 (natural log response ratio -0.399) emission mitigation as compared to CO2 (natural log response ratio -0.108).
“The meta-analysis provided by Shakoor et al. (2021) suggested that biochar application was more effective for CH 4 (natural log response ratio -0.399) emission mitigation as compared to CO 2 (natural log response ratio -0.108).”
From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Shakoor et al. (2021)
Cites
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · see citing works
Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change
Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2010) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1053 · Cited by 2,680 · see citing works
Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects
Wang, J., Xiong, Z., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12266 · Cited by 1,316 · see citing works
Biochar's role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: A review and meta-analysis
Cayuela, M. L., van Zwieten, L., Singh, B. P., Jeffery, S., Roig, A., & Sánchez-Monedero, M. A. (2014) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.009 · Cited by 1,053 · see citing works
Karhu, K., Mattila, T., Bergström, I., & Regina, K. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.005 · Cited by 941 · see citing works
Effects of biochar application on soil greenhouse gas fluxes: a meta‐analysis
He, Y., Zhou, X., Jiang, L., Li, M., Du, Z., Zhou, G., Shao, J., Wang, X., Xu, Z., Hosseini Bai, S., et al. (2017) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12376 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Pokharel, P., Ma, Z., & Chang, S. X. (2020) · Biochar · doi:10.1007/s42773-020-00039-1 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Meeting the Food Security Challenge for Nine Billion People in 2050: What Impact on Forests?
Bahar, N. H. A., Lo, M., Sanjaya, M., Van Vianen, J., Alexander, P., Ickowitz, A., & Sunderland, T. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102056 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Biochar suppresses N2O emissions while maintaining N availability in a sandy loam soil
Case, S. D. C., McNamara, N. P., Reay, D. S., Stott, A. W., Grant, H. K., & Whitaker, J. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.012 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Schimmelpfennig, S., Müller, C., Grünhage, L., Koch, C., & Kammann, C. (2014) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.027 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Influence of pig manure and its biochar on soil CO2 emissions and soil enzymes
Gascó, G., Paz-Ferreiro, J., Cely, P., Plaza, C., & Méndez, A. (2016) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.039 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Chen, G., Fang, Y., Van Zwieten, L., Xuan, Y., Tavakkoli, E., Wang, X., & Zhang, R. (2021) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108139 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality
Wang, L., Deng, J., Yang, X., Hou, R., & Hou, D. (2023) · Carbon Research · doi:10.1007/s44246-023-00035-7 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shakoor, A., Arif, M. S., Shahzad, S. M., Farooq, T. H., Ashraf, F., Altaf, M. M., Ahmed, W., Tufail, M. A., & Ashraf, M.
- Affiliations
- Universitat de Lleida (ES)
- Government College University, Faisalabad (PK)
- University of Sargodha (PK)
- Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CN)
- Lahore College for Women University (PK)
- Hainan University (CN)
- Guangzhou University (CN)
- University of Trento (IT)
- Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Shakoor, Awais
- Arif, Muhammad Saleem
- ORCID
- Venue
- Environmental Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 202
- Pages
- 111789
- ISSN
- 0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3191413127
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repositori ObertUDL (University of Lleida) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Universitat de Lleida
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- biochar, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, agricultural soils, methane emissions, nitrous oxide emissions, CO2 emissions, pyrolysis temperature, biochar feedstock, C/N ratio, soil pH, biochar application rate, maize, global warming potential, agricultural emissions
- MeSH terms
- Greenhouse Gases, Agriculture, Charcoal, Soil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review