Cited by 151Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Management and Crop Yield

Does biochar accelerate the mitigation of greenhouse gaseous emissions from agricultural soil? - A global meta-analysis

Open access
Shakoor, Awais, Arif, Muhammad Saleem, Shahzad, Sher Muhammad, Farooq, Taimoor Hassan, Ashraf, Fatima, Altaf, Muhammad Mohsin, Ahmed, Waqas, Tufail, Muhammad Aammar +1 more·2021·Environmental Research

Abstract

Greenhouse gaseous (GHGs) emissions from cropland soils are one of the major contributors to global warming. However, the extent and pattern of these climatic breakdowns are usally determined by the management practices in-place. The use of biochar on cropland soils holds a great promise for increasing the overall crop productivity. Nevertheless, biochar application to agricultural soils has grown in popularity as a strategy to off-set the negative feedback associated with agriculture GHGs emissions, i.e., CO 2 (carbon dioxide), CH 4 (methane), and N 2 O (nitrous oxide). Despite increasing efforts to uncover the potential of biochar to mitigate the farmland GHGs effects, there has been little synthesis of how different types of biochar affect GHGs fluxes from cropland soils under varied experimental conditions. Here, we presented a meta-analysis of the interactions between biochar and GHGs emissions across global cropland soils, with field experiments showing the strongest GHG mitigation potential, i.e. CO 2 (RR = -0.108) and CH 4 (RR = -0.399). The biochar pyrolysis temperature, feedstock, C: N ratio, and pH were also found to be important factors influencing GHGs emissions. A prominent reduction in N 2 O (RR = -0.13) and CH 4 (RR = -1.035) emissions was observed in neutral soils (pH = 6.6-7.3), whereas acidic soils (pH ≤ 6.5) accounted for the strongest mitigation effect on CO 2 compared to N 2 O and CH 4 emissions. We also found that a biochar application rate of 30 t ha-1 was best for mitigating GHGs emissions while achieving optimal crop yield. According to our meta-analysis, maize crop receiving biochar amendment showed a significant mitigation potential for CO 2, N 2 O, and CH 4 emissions. On the other hand, the use of biochar had shown significant impact on the global warming potential (GWP) of total GHGs emissions. The current data synthesis takes the lead in analyzing emissions status and mitigation potential for three of the most common GHGs from cropland soils and demonstrates that biochar application can significantly reduce the emissions budget from agriculture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111789

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wood biochars possessed highest potential to mitigate CH4 emissions (-1.198), followed by biosolids (-0.544) and herbaceous (-0.263) biochars.

    “Wood biochars possessed highest potential to mitigate ­ CH 4 emissions ( -1.198), followed by biosolids ( -0.544) and herbaceous ( -0.263) biochars (Shakoor et al. 2021).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Shakoor et al. 2021

  • The meta-analysis by Shakoor et al. (2021) suggested that neutral soil pH (6.6 ~ 7.3) favored CH4 emission mitigation, whereas an acidic nature of the amended soil promoted CH4 emissions following biochar application.

    “The meta-analysis by Shakoor et  al. (2021) also suggested that neutral soil pH (6.6 ~ 7.3) favored ­ CH4 emission mitigation, whereas an acidic nature of the amended soil promoted ­ CH 4 emissions following biochar application (Shakoor et  al. 2021).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Shakoor et al. (2021)

  • The meta-analysis by Shakoor et al. (2021) suggested that biochar application was more effective for CH4 (natural log response ratio -0.399) emission mitigation as compared to CO2 (natural log response ratio -0.108).

    “The meta-analysis provided by Shakoor et al. (2021) suggested that biochar application was more effective for ­ CH 4 (natural log response ratio -0.399) emission mitigation as compared to ­ CO 2 (natural log response ratio -0.108).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Shakoor et al. (2021)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shakoor, A., Arif, M. S., Shahzad, S. M., Farooq, T. H., Ashraf, F., Altaf, M. M., Ahmed, W., Tufail, M. A., & Ashraf, M.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Lleida (ES)
  • Government College University, Faisalabad (PK)
  • University of Sargodha (PK)
  • Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CN)
  • Lahore College for Women University (PK)
  • Hainan University (CN)
  • Guangzhou University (CN)
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK)
Corresponding author
  • Shakoor, Awais
  • Arif, Muhammad Saleem
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
202
Pages
111789
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3191413127
Cited by
151
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositori ObertUDL (University of Lleida) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Universitat de Lleida
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
biochar, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, agricultural soils, methane emissions, nitrous oxide emissions, CO2 emissions, pyrolysis temperature, biochar feedstock, C/N ratio, soil pH, biochar application rate, maize, global warming potential, agricultural emissions
MeSH terms
Greenhouse Gases, Agriculture, Charcoal, Soil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review