Cited by 10Diabetes Management and EducationHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Patient understanding of discharge instructions for home diabetes self-management and risk for hospital readmission and emergency department visits

Open access
Pinkhasova, Diana, Swami, Janya B., Patel, Neeti, Karslioglu-French, Esra, Hlasnik, Deborah S., Delisi, Kristin J., Donihi, Amy C., Rubin, Daniel J. +3 more·2021·Endocrine Practice

Abstract

Objective The primary objective of this study was to examine the patient comprehension of diabetes self-management instructions provided at hospital discharge as an associated risk of readmission. Methods Noncritically ill patients with diabetes completed patient comprehension questionnaires (PCQ) within 48 hours of discharge. PCQ scores were compared among patients with and without readmission or emergency department (ED) visits at 30 and 90 days. Glycemic measures 48 hours preceding discharge were investigated. Diabetes Early Readmission Risk Indicators (DERRIs) were calculated for each patient. Results Of 128 patients who completed the PCQ, scores were similar among those with 30-day (n = 31) and 90-day (n = 54) readmission compared with no readmission (n = 72) (79.9 ± 14.4 vs 80.4 ± 15.6 vs 82.3 ± 16.4, respectively) or ED visits. Clarification of discharge information was provided for 47 patients. PCQ scores of 100% were achieved in 14% of those with and 86% without readmission at 30 days (P = .108). Of predischarge glycemic measures, glycemic variability was negatively associated with PCQ scores (P = .035). DERRIs were significantly higher among patients readmitted at 90 days but not 30 days. Conclusion These results demonstrate similar PCQ scores between patients with and those without readmission or ED visits despite the need for corrective information in many patients. Measures of glycemic variability were associated with PCQ scores but not readmission risk. This study validates DERRI as a predictor for readmission at 90 days.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.03.013

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Providing diabetes self-management education and developing a diabetes discharge plan that includes continued access to diabetes medications and supplies and ongoing education and support are key strategies to improve long-term outcomes.

    “In addition, providing diabetes self-management education and developing a diabetes discharge plan that includes continued access to diabetes medications and supplies and ongoing education and support are key strategies to improve long-term outcomes (20,21).”

    From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Abstract > Conclusion recommends a structured discharge plan for continued diabetes self-management, and the Discussion describes education with postdischarge follow-up. The passages do not establish continued access to medications and supplies as part of that strategy. The Discussion reports outcomes over three months and says whether improvements last longer needs investigation, so the claim about improving long-term outcomes goes beyond this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinkhasova, D., Swami, J. B., Patel, N., Karslioglu-French, E., Hlasnik, D. S., Delisi, K. J., Donihi, A. C., Rubin, D. J., Siminerio, L. S., Wang, L., & Korytkowski, M. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Korytkowski, Mary T.
Venue
Endocrine Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
561-566
ISSN
1530-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3144847935
Cited by
9
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrine Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Endocrine Society (NCT03279627)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1-TR-001857)
  • American Diabetes Association
  • AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
diabetes self-management, patient understanding, hospital readmission, emergency department visits, glycemic variability
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Diabetes Mellitus, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review