The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fear and loathing of electric vehicles: The reactionary rhetoric of range anxiety
Open accessAbstract
“Range anxiety,” defined as the psychological anxiety a consumer experiences in response to the limited range of an electric vehicle, continues to be labelled and presented as one of the most pressing barriers to their mainstream diffusion. As a result, academia, policymakers and even industry have focused on addressing the range anxiety barrier in order to accelerate adoption. Much literature recognizes that range anxiety is increasingly psychological, rather than technical, in its nature. However, we argue in this paper that even psychological and technical explanations are incomplete. We examine range anxiety through Hirschman’s Rhetoric of Reaction, which supposes that conservative forces may oppose change by propagating theses related to jeopardy, perversity, and futility. To do so, we use three qualitative methods to understand the role of range anxiety triangulated via a variety of perspectives: 227 semi-structured interviews with experts at 201 institutions, a survey with nearly 5000 respondents, and 8 focus groups, all across 17 cities in the five Nordic countries. We find evidence where consumers and experts use and perpetuate the rhetoric of reaction, particularly the jeopardy thesis. We conclude with a reexamination of the policies geared to assuage range-based barriers, which a construction of range anxiety as a rhetorical excuse would render as ineffective or inefficient, as well as future implications for diffusion theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 13,723
Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002 · Cited by 2,741
Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: Calculating capacity and net revenue
Kempton, W., & Tomić, J. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.025 · Cited by 2,323
Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 · Cited by 2,269
The sociology of expectations in science and technology
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320600777002 · Cited by 1,902
Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009 · Cited by 1,797
Jacobson, M. Z., & Delucchi, M. A. (2011) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.040 · Cited by 1,570
The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy
HIRSCHMAN, A. O. (1991) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjnrs9q · Cited by 1,478
Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: a review and research agenda
Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010 · Cited by 1,301
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Franke, 2012, Adapting to the range of an electric vehicle–the relation of experience to subjectively available mobility resources, Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, 95
- Aune, 2003, The argument from evil in the rhetoric of reaction, Rhetor. Amp. Public Aff., 6, 518, 10.1353/rap.2003.0052 · doi:10.1353/rap.2003.0052
- Sender, 1994, Economic restructuring in South Africa: reactionary rhetoric prevails, J. South. Afr. Stud., 20, 539, 10.1080/03057079408708420 · doi:10.1080/03057079408708420
- Dollery, 2003, Rhetorical patterns in the Australian debate over war with Iraq, Prometheus, 21, 355, 10.1080/0810902032000113497 · doi:10.1080/0810902032000113497
- Greening, 2000, Energy e$ciency and consumption * the rebound e!ect * a survey, Energy Policy, 13
Cited by
Chen, C.-F., Zarazua de Rubens, G., Noel, L., Kester, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109692 · Cited by 314
Self-citationPevec, D., Babic, J., Carvalho, A., Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Y., Ketter, W., & Podobnik, V. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122779 · Cited by 283
Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use
Adhikari, M., Ghimire, L. P., Kim, Y., Aryal, P., & Khadka, S. B. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12124850 · Cited by 203
Analyzing incentives and barriers to electric vehicle adoption in the United States
Javadnejad, F., Jahanbakh, M., Pinto, C. A., & Saeidi, A. (2024) · Environment Systems and Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-023-09958-3 · Cited by 50
Range Extension via Electrothermal Recuperation
Steinstraeter, M., Lewke, M., Buberger, J., Hentrich, T., & Lienkamp, M. (2020) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj11020041 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Noel, L., Zarazua de Rubens, G., Sovacool, B. K., & Kester, J.
- Venue
- Energy Research & Social Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 96-107
- ISSN
- 2214-6296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2897575180
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Funders
- Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF) Sapere Aude (4182-00033B)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fear and loathing of electric vehicles: The reactionary rhetoric of range anxiety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.001
- The paper
- Noel, L., Zarazua de Rubens, G., Sovacool, B. K., & Kester, J. (2019). Fear and loathing of electric vehicles: The reactionary rhetoric of range anxiety. Energy Research & Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
