Cited by 14Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Unleashing the power of anti-HER2 therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: paving the way for a brighter future

Open access
Babkoff, A., Zick, A., Hubert, A., Tarantino, P., Grinshpun, A.·2024·ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) constitutes a significant portion of cancer-related deaths in the United States, topping cancer-related mortality among males under 50 years of age. Despite an increase in overall survival throughout the years, the prognosis of metastatic CRC remains poor. In addition to the classic molecular targets in CRC that include epidermal growth factor receptor, BRAF, and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification is an emerging target that has been successfully targeted in advanced CRC, particularly with anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. With the introduction of potent HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates, the number of patients who might be eligible for anti-HER2 therapy is expected to increase dramatically as tumors with lower expression of HER2 (termed HER2 low) have shown relevant response rates across several histologies. Yet, several challenges remain to be addressed in this field, including the standardized method to define HER2-low disease and the most efficient payload in this setting, among others. Future studies will help to further characterize HER2-low CRCs, identify additional predictive biomarkers, and assist in the development of better treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.esmogo.2023.100032

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babkoff, A., Zick, A., Hubert, A., Tarantino, P., & Grinshpun, A.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Grinshpun, A.
Venue
ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
3
Pages
100032
ISSN
2949-8198 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391460044
Cited by
14
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Gilead Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
metastatic colorectal cancer, HER2, HER2-targeted therapy, antibody-drug conjugates, HER2 amplification, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, predictive biomarkers, targeted therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review