Cited by 133Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Validation of HER2 Amplification as a Predictive Biomarker for Anti–Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Raghav, Kanwal, Loree, Jonathan M., Morris, Jeffrey S., Overman, Michael J., Yu, Ruoxi, Meric-Bernstam, Funda, Menter, David, Korphaisarn, Krittiya +11 more·2019·JCO Precision Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: HER2 amplification has been implicated in resistance to therapy with anti–epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies (anti-EGFRabs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The purpose of the study was to validate the predictive impact of HER2 amplification in mCRC. Patients and Methods: We analyzed patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC across two distinct cohorts. In cohort 1 (n = 98), HER2 amplification was tested in tumor tissue using dual in situ hybridization ( HER2 amplification: HER2/CEP17 ratio, 2.0 or greater). Cohort 2 (n = 70) included 16 patients with HER2 amplification and 54 HER2 nonamplified controls identified by next-generation sequencing ( HER2 amplification: four or more copies) who had received prior anti-EGFRabs. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) on treatment with anti-EGFRab therapy, which was estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: Median PFS in cohort 1 on anti-EGFRab–based therapy was significantly shorter in patients with HER2 amplification compared with HER2 nonamplified patients (2.8 v 8.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 7.05; 95% CI, 3.4 to 14.9; P < .001). These findings were validated in cohort 2 (median PFS for HER2 amplified v nonamplified: 2.8 v 9.3 months, respectively; HR, 10.66; 95% CI, 4.5 to 25.1; P < .001). The median PFS on therapy without anti-EGFRabs was similar among HER2-amplified and nonamplified patients in both cohort 1 (9.7 v 11.1 months, respectively; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.4; P = .97) and cohort 2 (9.6 v 11.3 months, respectively; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.5 to 3.1; P = .66). In multivariable analyses, HER2 amplification emerged as a single independent predictor of poor PFS on anti-EGFRab therapy in both cohort 1 (HR, 6.48; 95% CI, 3.1 to 13.6; P < .001) and cohort 2 (HR, 10.1; 95% CI, 4.3 to 23.9; P < .001). Conclusion: HER2 amplification in RAS/RAF wild-type mCRC seems to be a predictive biomarker for lack of efficacy of anti-EGFRab therapy. Screening patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC for HER2 amplification should be considered before anti-EGFRab treatment to guide therapy and to identify patients for early referral to clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/po.18.00226

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raghav, K., Loree, J. M., Morris, J. S., Overman, M. J., Yu, R., Meric-Bernstam, F., Menter, D., Korphaisarn, K., Kee, B., Muranyi, A., Singh, S., Routbort, M., Chen, K., Shaw, K. R. M., Katkhuda, R., Shanmugam, K., Maru, D., Fakih, M., & Kopetz, S.
Affiliations
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Kanwal Raghav, Jonathan M. Loree, Jeffrey S. Morris, Michael J. Overman, Ruoxi Yu, Funda Meric-Bernstam, David Menter, Krittiya Korphaisarn, Brian Kee, Mark Routbort, Ken Chen, Kenna R.M. Shaw, Riham Katkhuda, Dipen Maru, and Scott Kopetz, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Andrea Muranyi, Shalini Singh, and Kandavel Shanmugam, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ; and Marwan Fakih, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
Venue
JCO Precision Oncology
Published
2019-12
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
1-13
ISSN
2473-4284 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912216712
Cited by
132
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JCO Precision Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
HER2 amplification, metastatic colorectal cancer, anti-EGFR antibody therapy, predictive biomarkers, progression-free survival, RAS/BRAF wild-type, treatment resistance, HER2/CEP17 ratio, next-generation sequencing, anti-EGFR therapy, biomarker validation, prognostic factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review