Cited by 164Quality and Supply ManagementSustainable Supply Chain ManagementInnovation and Knowledge Management

Supply chain knowledge management: a literature review

Open access
Marra, Marianna, Ho, William, Edwards, John S.·2012·Expert Systems with Applications

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.035

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital technology alone has not been shown to improve organizational performance.

    “However, as underlined by Marra et al. (2012), there is no evidence that digital technology in itself contributes to the performance of an organization.”

    From The impact of big data analytics and artificial intelligence on green supply chain process integration and hospital environmental performance (2021) · cites this paper as Marra et al., 2012

    Section 5.2 says the reviewed studies could not establish a correlation between IT solutions and firms’ growth, and calls for combining technology with management practices. But the review describes the evidence for a positive relationship as weak, not nonexistent, and its conclusions concern firms in a supply-chain context rather than organizational performance generally. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Becker, M.C. (2001). Managing dispersed knowledge, Journal of Management Studies, 38, 1037-1051.
  2. Paton, R.A., & McLaughlin, S. (2008). Service innovation: knowledge transfer and the supply chain. European Management Journal, 26, 77-83.
  3. Marra, M; Ho, W; Edwards, J Title: Supply chain knowledge management: A literature review Date: 2012 Citation:
  4. Marra, M., Ho, W. & Edwards, J. (2012). Supply chain knowledge management: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 39 (5), pp.6103-6110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.035. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/118662 File Description: Accepted

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marra, M., Ho, W., & Edwards, J. S.
Affiliations
Aston University (GB)
Corresponding author
Marra, Marianna
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
6103-6110
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033149127
Cited by
164
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
20.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
supply chain management, information technology adoption, firm performance, knowledge obsolescence, knowledge accumulation, knowledge management applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review