CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rank matters–The impact of social competition on portfolio choice

Open access
Dijk, Oege, Holmen, Martin, Kirchler, Michael·2014·European Economic Review
DOI 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.11.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.11.010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dijk, Holmen and Kirchler (2014) show that rankings decrease (increase) future risk taking of over-performers (underperformers).

    “For example, Dijk, Holmen and Kirchler (2014) show that rankings decrease (increase) future risk taking of over-performers (underperformers)”

    From Copy Trading (2020) · cites this paper as Dijk, Holmen and Kirchler (2014)

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Aït-Sahalia, 2001, Variable selection for portfolio choice, J. Finance, 56, 1297, 10.1111/0022-1082.00369 · DOI
  2. Albuquerque, 2012, Skewness in stock returns: reconciling the evidence on firm versus aggregate returns, Rev. Financial Stud., 25, 1630, 10.1093/rfs/hhr144 · DOI
  3. Barberis, 2008, Stocks as lotteries: the implication for probability weighting for security prices, Am. Econ. Rev., 98, 2066, 10.1257/aer.98.5.2066 · DOI
  4. Bault, 2008, Interdependent utilities: how social ranking affects choice behavior, PLoS One, 3, 3477, 10.1371/journal.pone.0003477 · DOI
  5. Bault, 2011, Medial prefrontal cortex and striatum mediate the influence of social competition on the decision process, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 108, 16044, 10.1073/pnas.1100892108 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bebchuk, 2010, Regulating bankers' pay, Georgetown Law J., 9, 247
  7. Becker, 2005, The equilibrium distribution of income and the market for status, J. Political Econ., 113, 282, 10.1086/427463 · DOI
  8. Brown, 1996, Of tournaments and temptations: an analysis of managerial incentives in the mutual fund industry, J. Finance, 51, 85, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05203.x · DOI
  9. Brown, 2001, Careers and survival: competition and risk in the hedge fund and CTA industry, J. Finance, 56, 1869, 10.1111/0022-1082.00392 · DOI
  10. Camerer, 1999, The effects of financial incentives in experiments: a review and capital-labor-production framework, J. Risk Uncertainty, 19, 7, 10.1023/A:1007850605129 · DOI
  11. Charness, 2010, Portfolio choice and risk-attitudes: an experiment, Econ. Inquiry, 48, 133, 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00219.x · DOI
  12. Chevalier, 1997, Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives, J. Political Econ., 105, 1167, 10.1086/516389 · DOI
  13. Cole, 2001, Investment and concern for relative position, Rev. Econ. Des., 6, 241, 10.1007/PL00013706 · DOI
  14. Elton, 2003, Incentive fees and mutual funds, J. Finance, 58, 779, 10.1111/1540-6261.00545 · DOI
  15. Fischbacher, 2007, Z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, Exp. Econ., 10, 171, 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4 · DOI
  16. Friedman, 1948, The utility analysis of choices involving risk, J. Political Econ., 56, 279, 10.1086/256692 · DOI
  17. Gächter, S., E.J. Johnson, A. Herrmann. 2007. Individual-level Loss Aversion in Riskless and Risky Choices. CeDEx Discussion Paper No. 2007-02. · DOI
  18. Gennaioli, 2010, Neglected risks, financial innovation, and financial fragility, J. Financial Econ., 104, 452, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.005 · DOI
  19. Greiner, B., 2004. Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003, an on-line recruitment system for economic experiments. GWDG Bericht 63. Gesellschaft fuer Wissenschafliche Datenverarbeitung, Goettingen, pp. 79–93.
  20. James, 2000, Asset markets: how they are affected by tournament incentives for individuals, Am. Econ. Rev., 90, 995, 10.1257/aer.90.4.995 · DOI
  21. Krasny, 2011, Asset pricing with status risk, Q. J. Finance, 1, 495, 10.1142/S2010139211000134 · DOI
  22. Lichtenstein, 1971, Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions, J. Exp. Psychol., 89, 46, 10.1037/h0031207 · DOI
  23. Linde, 2012, Social competition and risky choices, J. Risk Uncertainty, 44, 45, 10.1007/s11166-011-9135-z · DOI
  24. Nieken, 2010, Risk-taking tournaments – theory and experimental evidence, J. Econ. Psychol., 31, 254, 10.1016/j.joep.2009.03.009 · DOI
  25. Palan, 2013, A review of bubbles and crashes in experimental asset markets, J. Econ. Surv., 27, 570, 10.1111/joes.12023 · DOI
  26. Rajan, 2006, Has financial development made the world riskier?, Eur. Financial Manage., 12, 499, 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2006.00330.x · DOI
  27. Robson, 1992, Status, the distribution of wealth, private and social attitudes to risk, Econometrica, 60, 837, 10.2307/2951568 · DOI
  28. Rosenberg, J., Schuermann, T., 2004. A General Approach to Integrated Risk Management with Skewed, Fat-tailed Risks. Staff Report. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, No. 185. · DOI
  29. Roussanov, 2010, Diversification and its discounts: idiosyncratic and entrepreneurial risk in the quest for social status, J. Finance, 65, 1755, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01593.x · DOI
  30. Schoenberg, 2012, Relative performance information in asset markets: an experimental approach, J. Econ. Psychol., 33, 1143, 10.1016/j.joep.2012.08.008 · DOI
  31. Sirri, 1998, Costly search and mutual fund flows, J. Finance, 53, 1589, 10.1111/0022-1082.00066 · DOI
  32. Tversky, 1992, Advances in Prospect Theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty, J. Risk Uncertainty, 5, 297, 10.1007/BF00122574 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Walker, D., 2009. A Review of Corporate Governance in UK Banks and Other Financial Industry Entities: Final Recommendations. Financial Service Authority.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dijk, O., Holmen, M., & Kirchler, M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Corresponding author
Kirchler, Michael
ORCID
Venue
European Economic Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
66
Pages
97-110
ISSN
0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.11.010
OpenAlex
W2065822189
Cited by
73
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
VINNOVA
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
tournament incentives, relative performance, status concerns, portfolio optimization, risk-taking, skewness preference, incentive mechanisms, laboratory experiments, financial decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review