Cited by 162Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Medial prefrontal cortex and striatum mediate the influence of social comparison on the decision process

Open access
Bault, Nadège, Joffily, Mateus, Rustichini, Aldo, Coricelli, Giorgio·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We compared private and social decision making to investigate the neural underpinnings of the effect of social comparison on risky choices. We measured brain activity using functional MRI while participants chose between two lotteries: in the private condition, they observed the outcome of the unchosen lottery, and in the social condition, the outcome of the lottery chosen by another person. The striatum, a reward-related brain structure, showed higher activity when participants won more than their counterpart (social gains) compared with winning in isolation and lower activity when they won less than their counterpart (social loss) compared with private loss. The medial prefrontal cortex, implicated in social reasoning, was more activated by social gains than all other events. Sensitivity to social gains influenced both brain activity and behavior during subsequent choices. Specifically, striatal activity associated with social gains predicted medial prefrontal cortex activity during social choices, and experienced social gains induced more risky and competitive behavior in later trials. These results show that interplay between reward and social reasoning networks mediates the influence of social comparison on the decision process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1100892108

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ventral striatum activity is greater when we gain a larger reward than someone else or even lose less than someone else.

    “Ventral striatum activity is greater when we gain a larger reward than someone else or even lose less than someone else 82–84.”
  • People who show a larger ventral striatal increase for outperforming another person will take more risks to outperform someone else.

    “For example, people who show a larger ventral striatal increase for outperforming another person will take more risks to outperform someone else 83.”
  • Even when our own outcomes do not depend on other people, we prefer when our own outcomes are better than someone else's.

    “Even when our own outcomes do not depend on other people, we prefer when our own outcomes are better than someone else's and we make decisions to try to gain better outcomes than someone else 82, 83.”
  • Reward signals in the striatum are sensitive to comparisons of our own reward outcomes and status with those of other people.

    “Research has suggested that reward signals in the striatum are sensitive to comparisons of our own reward outcomes and status with those of other people.”
  • We make decisions to try to gain better outcomes than someone else.

    “Even when our own outcomes do not depend on other people, we prefer when our own outcomes are better than someone else's and we make decisions to try to gain better outcomes than someone else 82, 83.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bault, N., Joffily, M., Rustichini, A., & Coricelli, G.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-09-06
Volume
108
Issue
38
Pages
16044-16049
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2164444114
Cited by
162
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G005230/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
social comparison, decision making under risk, decision-making, medial prefrontal cortex, striatum, social benefits, social loss, competitive behavior, reward processing, social reasoning
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Corpus Striatum, Decision Making, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Gambling, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review