The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ambiguity and excuse-driven behavior in charitable giving
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People may be less willing to make sacrifices for others when the benefits are uncertain.
“People may be less willing to make sacrifices for others when the benefits are uncertain 174,175 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [175]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
“Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.”
Ellsberg, D. (1961) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884324 · Cited by 7,891
Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving
Andreoni, J. (1990) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234133 · Cited by 5,825
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,658
ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166 · Cited by 5,399
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. J. (1982) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.002 · Cited by 3,699
Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism
James Andreoni, A., & Miller, J. H. (2002) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00302 · Cited by 1,921
Engel, C. (2011) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7 · Cited by 1,880
Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially
Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.99.1.544 · Cited by 1,753
Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness
Dana, J., Weber, R. A., & Kuang, J. X. (2007) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/s00199-006-0153-z · Cited by 1,445
Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.1.340 · Cited by 1,146
The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance
Akerlof, G. A., & Dickens, W. T. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199253906.003.0009 · Cited by 1,138
Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528347.009 · Cited by 978
hroot: Hamburg Registration and Organization Online Tool
Bock, O., Baetge, I., & Nicklisch, A. (2014) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.07.003 · Cited by 702
What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games
Dana, J. D., Cain, D. M., & Dawes, R. M. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.10.001 · Cited by 689
The Rich Domain of Uncertainty: Source Functions and Their Experimental Implementation
Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., & Wakker, P. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.695 · Cited by 586
Self-Interest through Delegation: An Additional Rationale for the Principal-Agent Relationship
Hamman, J., Loewenstein, G. F., & Weber, R. A. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.4.1826 · Cited by 399
Excusing Selfishness in Charitable Giving: The Role of Risk
Exley, C. L. (2015) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdv051 · Cited by 324
Self-Image and Willful Ignorance in Social Decisions
Grossman, Z., & van der Weele, J. J. (2016) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvw001 · Cited by 319
Living kidney donation: outcomes, ethics, and uncertainty
Reese, P. P., Boudville, N. C., & Garg, A. X. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62484-3 · Cited by 245
Temporal Stability of Time Preferences
Meier, S., & Sprenger, C. D. (2014) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00433 · Cited by 244
Ambiguity and Ambiguity Aversion
Machina, M. J., & Siniscalchi, M. (2014) · Handbook of risk and uncertainty · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53685-3.00013-1 · Cited by 230
Dictating the Risk: Experimental Evidence on Giving in Risky Environments
Brock, J., Lange, A., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.1.415 · Cited by 228
Are You Risk Averse over Other People's Money?
Chakravarty, S., Harrison, G. W., Haruvy, E. E., & Rutström, E. E. (2011) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.4284/0038-4038-77.4.901 · Cited by 208
Self-serving interpretations of ambiguity in other-regarding behavior
Haisley, E., & Weber, R. A. (2009) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2009.08.002 · Cited by 200
Deciding for others reduces loss aversion
Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J.-R., & Wengström, E. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2085 · Cited by 194
The Costs of Deception: Evidence from Psychology
Ortmann, A., & Hertwig, R. (2002) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1020365204768 · Cited by 183
‘Give me a chance!’ An experiment in social decision under risk
Krawczyk, M. W., & Lec, F. L. (2010) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-010-9253-5 · Cited by 170
Social Preferences under Risk: Equality of Opportunity versus Equality of Outcome
Saito, K. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.7.3084 · Cited by 167
Decision making for others involving risk: A review and meta-analysis
Polman, E., & Wu, K. (2019) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2019.06.007 · Cited by 163
Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Experimental Economics
Werner, P., Riedl, A. M., Schram, A. J. H. C., & Ule, A. (2019) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781788110563 · Cited by 110
Using Charity Performance Metrics as an Excuse Not to Give
Exley, C. L. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3268 · Cited by 109
Economic Consequences Incurred by Living Kidney Donors: A Canadian Multi-Center Prospective Study
Klarenbach, S. W., Gill, J., Knoll, G. A., Caulfield, T., Boudville, N. C., Prasad, G. V. R., Karpinski, M., Storsley, L. J., Treleaven, D. J., Arnold, J. B., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.12662 · Cited by 104
Reynolds, D. B., Joseph, J., & Sherwood, R. (2011) · Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER) · doi:10.19030/jber.v7i1.2251 · Cited by 87
Risk taking by agents: The role of ex-ante and ex-post accountability
Pollmann, M. M. H., Potters, J., & Trautmann, S. T. (2014) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2014.04.004 · Cited by 87
Testing models of information avoidance with binary choice dictator games
Feiler, L. (2014) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2014.10.003 · Cited by 85
Motivated memory in dictator games
Saucet, C., & Villeval, M. C. (2019) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2019.05.011 · Cited by 78
Self-citationChew, S. H., Bin, M., & Zhong, S. (2017) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta13239 · Cited by 70
Uncertainty Equivalents: Testing the Limits of the Independence Axiom
Andreoni, J., & Sprenger, C. D. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w17342 · Cited by 66
Cettolin, E., Riedl, A. M., & Tran, G. (2017) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-017-9270-2 · Cited by 57
A Note on Deception in Economic Experiments
Cooper, D. J. (2014) · Journal of Wine Economics · doi:10.1017/jwe.2014.18 · Cited by 53
The Rich Domain of Ambiguity Explored
Li, Z., Müller, J., Wakker, P. P., & Wang, T. V. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2777 · Cited by 53
Generating Ambiguity in the Laboratory
Stecher, J. D., Shields, T. W., & Dickhaut, J. W. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1307 · Cited by 48
Do financial advisors exhibit myopic loss aversion?
Eriksen, K. W., & Kvaløy, O. (2009) · Financial markets and portfolio management · doi:10.1007/s11408-009-0124-z · Cited by 39
Krawczyk, M. W. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2019.01.008 · Cited by 36
On the determinants of giving under risk
Freundt, J., & Lange, A. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.017 · Cited by 33
It’s Not A Lie If You Believe It: Lying and Belief Distortion Under Norm-UncertaintyPreprint
Bicchieri, C., Dimant, E., & Sonderegger, S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3326146 · Cited by 33
Ambiguity attitudes in decisions for others
König-Kersting, C., & Trautmann, S. T. (2016) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2016.07.036 · Cited by 20
It's Not a Lie If You Believe It: Lying and Belief Distortion Under Norm-UncertaintyPreprint
Bicchieri, C., & Dimant, E. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3243973 · Cited by 20
Motivated misremembering of selfish decisionsPreprint
Carlson, R. W., Maréchal, M. A., Oud, B., Fehr, E., & Crockett, M. J. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7ck25 · Cited by 14
Ortmann, A. (2019) · Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Experimental Economics · doi:10.4337/9781788110563.00009
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Charness, 2019, What is deception in experimental economics? Asurvey, Mimeo
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z · Cited by 4,964
Using Social and Behavioural Science to Support COVID-19 Pandemic ResponsePreprint
Bavel, J. J. V., D, K. B. A., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A. K., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4178356 · Cited by 89
Momsen, K., & Ohndorf, M. (2021) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2021.102457 · Cited by 45
Fair and Unfair Income Inequality
Cappelen, A. W., Falch, R., & Tungodden, B. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_130-1 · Cited by 35
Banerjee, R., Boly, A., & Gillanders, R. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.03.006 · Cited by 43
Exley, C. L., & Kessler, J. B. (2024) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20191849 · Cited by 28
Exley, C. L., & Kessler, J. B. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w26595 · Cited by 22
The social construction of ignorance: Experimental evidence
Soraperra, I., van der Weele, J. J., Villeval, M. C., & Shalvi, S. (2023) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2022.12.002 · Cited by 16
Self-citationDaud, M., Wahid, H., & Noor, M. (2022) · International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.170321 · Cited by 12
Hyper-altruistic behavior vanishes with high stakes
Brañas‐Garza, P., Jorrat, D., Kovářík, J., & López, M. C. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255668 · Cited by 14
When does less information translate into more giving to public goods?
Aksoy, B., & Krasteva, S. S. (2020) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-020-09643-1 · Cited by 12
Long Term Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Social Concerns
Blanco, E., Baier, A., Holzmeister, F., Jaber-López, T., & Struwe, N. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743054 · Cited by 11
‘Three is better than two’: Increasing donations with the attraction effect
Pittarello, A., Caserotti, M., & Rubaltelli, E. (2019) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12428 · Cited by 11
Substitution of social sustainability concerns under the Covid-19 pandemic
Blanco, E., Baier, A., Holzmeister, F., Jaber-López, T., & Struwe, N. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107259 · Cited by 11
A dual-process approach to prosocial behavior under COVID-19 uncertainty
Costa, D., Fernandes, N., Arantes, J., & Keating, J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266050 · Cited by 9
Understanding Altruism of Nonprofit Workers: The Roles of Motivation Types
Uğur, Z. B., & Heermans, G. (2024) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08997640231222241 · Cited by 8
Actions and the Self: I Give, Therefore I am?
Regner, T., & Matthey, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684078 · Cited by 8
Schoenegger, P., & Costa‐Gomes, M. A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273971 · Cited by 8
Avoiding the cost of your conscience: belief dependent preferences and information acquisition
Rimbaud, C., & Soldà, A. (2024) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-024-09827-z · Cited by 7
Decomposition of the impact of government and private transfers on income inequality in China
Liu, J., Wang, C., Wang, J., & Yang, C. (2024) · Review of Development Economics · doi:10.1111/rode.13086 · Cited by 6
Coordinating donations via an intermediary: The destructive effect of a sunk overhead cost
Abraham, D., Corazzini, L., Fišar, M., & Reggiani, T. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.05.006 · Cited by 6
Psychological science for a responsible sharing economy
Shalvi, S., Mol, J. M., Molho, C., Vu, L., Leib, M., & Soraperra, I. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.032 · Cited by 5
Measuring Charitable Giving: How to Capture Charitable Behavior in Philanthropy Research
Chapman, C. M., Thottam, A. K., Schultz, T., McKay, K. T., & Gulliver, R. (2025) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08997640251351548 · Cited by 4
The affiliative power of others' pain online
Mitchell, J., Occhipinti, S., & Oaten, M. (2022) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12941 · Cited by 3
Caferra, R., Morone, A., & Morone, P. (2025) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-025-09464-8 · Cited by 3
Comportements (non) éthiques et stratégies morales
Villeval, M. C. (2019) · Revue économique · doi:10.3917/reco.706.1021 · Cited by 3
Self-citationMolnár, A., & Paolacci, G. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-83621-y · Cited by 3
Competition among public good providers for donor rewards
Struwe, N., Blanco, E., & Walker, J. M. (2022) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-022-09766-7 · Cited by 2
Uncertainty-Driven Moral BehaviorPreprint
Chen, Y., & Zhong, S. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3737959 · Cited by 2
Hyper-altruistic behavior vanishes with high stakesPreprint
Brañas‐Garza, P., Jorrat, D., Kovářík, J., & López, M. C. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/b79e4 · Cited by 2
Avoiding the Cost of your Conscience: Belief Dependent Preferences and Information AcquisitionPreprint
Series, G. W. P., Rimbaud, C., & Soldà, A. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3911223 · Cited by 2
Beyond Social Influence: Examining the Efficacy of Non-Social RecommendationsPreprint
Arroyos-Calvera, D., Lohse, J., & McDonald, R. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4469236 · Cited by 2
When Giving Justifies Gambling: Theory and Experimental Evidence on Prosocial Risk-takingPreprint
Ballicu, G., Atzori, F., & Pelligra, V. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5350667 · Cited by 2
Experimental evidence on sharing rules and additionality in transfer payments
Blanco, E., Struwe, N., & Walker, J. M. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.012 · Cited by 10
Reciprocity information and wage personalization
Zheng, K., Wang, X., & Ni, D. (2021) · China Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101645 · Cited by 1
An experimental comparison of contributions in collective prevention games and public goods games
Flambard, V., Lec, F. L., & Romaniuc, R. (2024) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.13236 · Cited by 1
Beyond social influence: Examining the efficacy of non-social recommendations
Arroyos-Calvera, D., Lohse, J., & McDonald, R. L. (2024) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104801 · Cited by 3
Ambiguity and technology adoption under index insurance: Experimental evidence
Jozwik, J. (2025) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102854 · Cited by 1
Blicher, A., Gleasure, R., Constantiou, I., & Clement, J. (2026) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2026.2631718 · Cited by 1
ambigüedad y su afectación en las organizaciones. Una revisión de literatura.
Abril, D. Y. O., Valencia, P. C., García, M. G., & Serna, Y. M. (2021) · Global Business Administration Journal · doi:10.31381/gbaj.v5i1.3726 · Cited by 1
Delegation and Overhead Aversion with Multiple Threshold Public Goods
Abraham, D. E., Corazzini, L., Fišar, M., & Tommaso, R. (2021) · MUNI ECON Working Papers · doi:10.5817/wp_muni_econ_2021-14 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and PivotalityPreprint
Klockmann, V., von Schenk, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4003065 · Cited by 1
Self-citationRisk as Excuses to Postpone Effort-ProvisionPreprint
Zou, W. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3925963 · Cited by 1
Avoiding the Cost of your Conscience: Belief Dependent Preferences and Information Acquisition
Rimbaud, C., & Soldà, A. (2021) · heiDOK (Heidelberg University) · doi:10.11588/heidok.00030443
Deterministic vs. Stochastic AltruismPreprint
Galliera, A., & Ponti, G. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4287452
Levels of uncertainty and charitable givingPreprint
Montoya-Villalobos, M. J., & Berlin, N. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5160087
Air travel during times of crisis: The role of social preferences and uncertainty
Randrianarisoa, L. M. (2024) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.08.015
Dishonesty in Complex Environments: Deliberate Lies, Shortcuts, or Accidental Mistakes?Preprint
Nieder, P., & Simon, S. A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5064242
Artificial intelligence, distributional fairness, and pivotality
Klockmann, V., von Schenk, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2025) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105098 · Cited by 1
Self-citationRelative Poverty and Antipoverty Effects of Public and Private Transfers in China
Liao, H., Liu, H., & Wang, J. (2025) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-025-03791-8
Playing It Safe? Voters Decode Politicians' Not Answering as an Answer
Mitsui, C., & Kawamura, Y. (2026) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.70019
Comportements pro-environnementaux, incertitude et bien-être social
Montoya-Villalobos, M. J. (2023) · doi:10.70675/2a80771cz8f50z40b4zaf96z8853b76ccdd6
The effects of self-uncertainty on benevolent and malevolent creativity
Yuan, H., Min, H., Lu, K., Xiang, M., & Hao, N. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-04615-1
Intertemporal coordination in volunteer markets
Lorko, M., Servátka, M., Slonim, R. L., & Ďuriník, M. (2026) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2026.103155
Pro-environmental behavior under risk and ambiguity: evidence from a lab experiment
Caferra, R., Morone, A., & Morone, P. (2026) · Economia Politica · doi:10.1007/s40888-026-00411-7
How default risk shapes social choice
Höchtl, W., Kerschbamer, R., Kircher, P., Ludwig, S., & Sandroni, A. (2026) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2026.113128
Becchetti, L., Buso, I. M., Corazzini, L., & Pelligra, V. (2026) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-026-10159-y
Eliciting moral preferences under image concerns: Theory and experiment
Bénabou, R., Falk, A., Henkel, L., & Jean Tirole, Z. (2026) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2026.104044
Situational ambiguity induces opportunistic rule breaking and erodes social norms
Molleman, L., Nosenzo, D., & Venema, T. A. G. (2026) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2026.102939 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcia, T., Massoni, S., & Villeval, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Villeval, Marie Claire
- Venue
- European Economic Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 124
- Pages
- 103412
- ISSN
- 0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903305938
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Economic Review (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-LABX-0042, 37770TF, 183634)
- Université de Lyon (ANR-11-IDEX-007)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Keywords
- charitable giving, ambiguity, moral wiggle room, guilt, risk, uncertainty, generosity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
