Cited by 95Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesCardiac Health and Mental Health

A well-being programme in severe mental illness. Reducing risk for physical ill-health: a post-programme service evaluation at 2 years.

Smith, Shubulade, Yeomans, David, Bushe, Chris J.P., Eriksson, Cecilia, Harrison, Tom, Holmes, Robert, Mynors-Wallis, Laurence, Oatway, Helen +1 more·2007·European Psychiatry

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease is more prevalent in patients with severe mental illness (SMI) than in the general population. METHOD: Seven geographically diverse centres were assigned a nurse to monitor the physical health of SMI patients in secondary care over a 2-year period in the "Well-being Support Programme" (WSP). A physical health screen was performed and patients were given individual weight and lifestyle advice including smoking cessation to reduce cardiovascular risk. RESULTS: Nine hundred and sixty-six outpatients with SMI >2 years were enrolled. The completion rate at 2 years was 80%. Significant improvements were observed in levels of physical activity (p<0.0001), smoking (p<0.05) and diet (p<0.0001). There were no changes in mean BMI although 42% lost weight over 2 years. Self-esteem improved significantly. Low self-esteem decreased from 43% at baseline to 15% at 2 years (p<0.0001). At the end of the programme significant cardiovascular risk factors remained, 46% of subjects smoked, 26% had hypertension and 81% had BMI >25. CONCLUSION: Physical health problems are common in SMI subjects. Many patients completed 2 years follow up suggesting that this format of programme is an acceptable option for SMI patients. Cardiovascular risk factors were significantly improved. Interventions such as the Well-being Support Programme should be made widely available to people with SMI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.07.002

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, S., Yeomans, D., Bushe, C. J. P., Eriksson, C., Harrison, T., Holmes, R., Mynors-Wallis, L., Oatway, H., & Sullivan, G.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Eli Lilly (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Glamorgan (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Shubulade
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2007-08-31
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
413-418
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2056543027
Cited by
95
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
severe mental illness, cardiovascular risk, physical health, nurse-led intervention, physical activity, smoking cessation, diet, weight loss, self-esteem, hypertension, body mass index, lifestyle advice
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adult, Mental Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Health Promotion, Health Status, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Obesity, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Smoking, Time Factors, Smoking Cessation, Program Development, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review