The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Problem-solving therapy for adult depression: An updated meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background: Problem-solving therapy (PST) is one of the best examined types of psychotherapy for adult depression. No recent meta-analysis has examined the effects of PST compared to control groups or to other treatments. We wanted to verify whether PST is effective, whether effects are comparable to those of other treatments, and whether we could identify the possible sources of high heterogeneity that was found in earlier meta-analyses. Methods: We conducted systematic searches in bibliographical databases, including PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase and the Cochrane database of randomized trials. Results: We included 30 randomized controlled trials on PST (with 3530 patients), in which PST was compared to control conditions, with other therapies, and with pharmacotherapy. We could compare these 30 trials on PST also with 259 trials on other psychotherapies for adult depression. The effect size of PST versus control groups was g = 0.79 (0.57–1.01) with very high heterogeneity (I 2= 84; 95% CI: 77–88). The effect size from the 9 studies with low risk of bias was g = 0.34 (95% CI: 0.22–0.46) with low heterogeneity (I 2= 32; 95% CI: 0–68), which is comparable to the effects of other psychotherapies. PST was a little more effective than other therapies in direct comparisons, but that may be explained by the considerable number of studies with researcher allegiance towards PST. In meta-regression analyses of all controlled studies, no significant difference between PST and other therapies was found. Conclusion: PST is probably an effective treatment for depression, with effect sizes that are small, but comparable to those found for other psychological treatments of depression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“PST also has demonstrated efficacy in treating depression [39] and anxiety [40].”
From Mental health needs among patients experiencing extended antepartum hospitalization: A qualitative study (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Problem solving and behavior modification.
D'Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031360 · Cited by 2,257
Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Patsopoulos, N. A., & Evangelou, E. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39343.408449.80 · Cited by 1,254
Behavioral activation treatments of depression: a meta-analysis.
Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., & Warmerdam, L. (2007) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.11.001 · Cited by 1,144
Self-citationCuijpers, P., Donker, T., van Straten, A., Li, J., & Andersson, G. (2010) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291710000772 · Cited by 832
Self-citationBehavioral Treatment of Depression in Dementia Patients: A Controlled Clinical Trial
Teri, L. L., Logsdon, R. G., Uomoto, J. M., & McCurry, S. M. (1997) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/52b.4.p159 · Cited by 641
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Beck, 1996, BDI-II. Beck depression inventory second edition. Manual
- Schmitt, 1988, Clinical depression: a comparative outcome study of two treatment approaches
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Role of Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcomes
Cuijpers, P., Reijnders, M., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2019) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095424 · Cited by 748
Self-citationMalhi, G. S., Bell, E., Bassett, D., Boyce, P., Bryant, R., Hazell, P., Hopwood, M., Lyndon, B., Mulder, R., Porter, R., et al. (2021) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867420979353 · Cited by 614
Karyotaki, E., Cuijpers, P., Albor, Y., Alonso, J., Auerbach, R. P., Bantjes, J., Bruffaerts, R., Ebert, D. D., Hasking, P., Kiekens, G., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01759 · Cited by 389
Self-citationLam, R. W. M., Kennedy, S. H., Adams, G. C., Bahji, A., Beaulieu, S., Bhat, V., Blier, P., Blumberger, D. M., Brietzke, E. M., Chakrabarty, T., et al. (2024) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/07067437241245384 · Cited by 435
The effects of fifteen evidence-supported therapies for adult depression: A meta-analytic review
Cuijpers, P., Karyotaki, E., de Wit, L., & Ebert, D. D. (2020) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2019.1649732 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cuijpers, P., de Wit, L., Kleiboer, A., Karyotaki, E., & Ebert, D. D.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Cuijpers, Pim
- Venue
- European Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-37
- ISSN
- 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 1778-3585
- OpenAlex
- W2783308789
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Problem Solving Skills Development
- Keywords
- problem-solving therapy, adult depression, psychotherapy effectiveness, treatment effect heterogeneity, researcher bias, meta-regression
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Problem Solving, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review