Cited by 337Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

Psychological treatment of depression: Results of a series of meta-analyses

Cuijpers, Pim, Andersson, Gerhard, Donker, Tara, van Straten, Annemieke·2011·Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the past few decades, a considerable number of studies have examined the effects of psychotherapies for adult depression. AIM: We described the results of a series of meta-analyses examining what this large body of research has contributed to our knowledge of these treatments of depression. RESULTS: We found that different types of psychotherapy are efficacious in the treatment of adult depression, including cognitive behavior therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, problem-solving therapy, non-directive supportive therapy and behavioral activation therapy. Differences between types of psychotherapy are small. The efficacy of psychotherapy for mild to moderate depression is about the same as the efficacy of pharmacotherapy, and that combined treatment is more effective than psychotherapy alone and pharmacotherapy alone. Psychotherapy is not only effective in depressed adults in general, but also in older adults, women with postpartum depression, patients with general medical disorders, in inpatients, in primary care patients, patients with chronic depression and in subthreshold depression. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence showing that psychotherapy is less efficacious in severe depression (with mean baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores up to 31, mean Beck Depression Inventory scores up to 35.85 and mean Beck Depression Inventory-II scores up to 36.50), but effects are smaller in chronic depression. We also found that the effects of psychotherapy are probably overestimated because of publication bias and the relatively low quality of many studies in the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/08039488.2011.596570

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuijpers, P., Andersson, G., Donker, T., & van Straten, A.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Cuijpers, Pim
Venue
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2011-07-20
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
354-364
ISSN
  • 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-9488
  • 1502-4725
OpenAlex
W2001447430
Cited by
335
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
20.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
depression, psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, problem-solving therapy, supportive therapy, behavioral activation, pharmacotherapy, combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, chronic depression, postpartum depression, older adults, publication bias, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Psychotherapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review