The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006 · Cited by 10,578
Whiting, P., Rutjes, A. W., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. M., & Kleijnen, J. (2003) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25 · Cited by 3,592
PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2
Weinreb, J. C., Barentsz, J. O., Choyke, P. L., Cornud, F., Haider, M. A., Macura, K. J., Margolis, D., Schnall, M. D., Shtern, F., Tempany, C. M., et al. (2016) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052 · Cited by 2,951
Deeks, J. J., Macaskill, P., & Irwig, L. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016 · Cited by 2,910
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
Barentsz, J. O., Richenberg, J., Clements, R., Choyke, P., Verma, S., Villeirs, G., Rouviere, O., Logager, V., & Fütterer, J. J. (2012) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y · Cited by 2,438
Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests
Deeks, J. J. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157 · Cited by 1,340
Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests
(2001) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 850
Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection, Localization, and Staging
Hoeks, C. M. A., Barentsz, J. O., Hambrock, T., Yakar, D., Somford, D. M., Heijmink, S. W. T. P. J., Scheenen, T. W. J., Vos, P. C., Huisman, H., van Oort, I. M., et al. (2011) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.11091822 · Cited by 677
Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Meta-Analysis
de Rooij, M., Hamoen, E. H. J., Fütterer, J. J., Barentsz, J. O., & Rovers, M. M. (2014) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.13.11046 · Cited by 470
Cited by
Turkbey, B., Rosenkrantz, A. B., Haider, M. A., Padhani, A. R., Villeirs, G., Macura, K. J., Tempany, C. M., Choyke, P. L., Cornud, F., Margolis, D. J., et al. (2019) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033 · Cited by 2,544
Machine learning in prostate MRI for prostate cancer: current status and future opportunities
Li, H., Lee, C. H., Chia, D., Lin, Z., Huang, W., & Tan, C. H. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12020289 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Woo, S., Suh, C. H., Kim, S. Y., Cho, J. Y., & Kim, S. H.
- Venue
- European Urology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-188
- ISSN
- 0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2586386444
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.042
- The paper
- Woo, S., Suh, C. H., Kim, S. Y., Cho, J. Y., & Kim, S. H. (2017). Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
