The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
Qualitative research and evaluation methods
Patton, M. Q. (1980) · Cited by 35,626
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
Lewis, S. (2015) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839915580941 · Cited by 22,105
(2008) · Biostatistics and Microbiology: A Survival Manual · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77282-0_6 · Cited by 17,371
(1998) · Cited by 13,501
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Morgan, D. (1997) · doi:10.4135/9781412984287 · Cited by 8,863
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
Billson, J. M. (1989) · Human Biology · Cited by 8,560
Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2012) · Cited by 5,975
Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x02239569 · Cited by 5,475
Cited by
Theme in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis
Vaismoradi, M., & Snelgrove, S. R. (2019) · Forum qualitative Sozialforschung · doi:10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376 · Cited by 441
Nicholl, H., Tracey, C., Begley, T., King, C., & Lynch, A. M. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5834 · Cited by 143
Goodman, L. A., Banyard, V., Woulfe, J., Ash, S., & Mattern, G. (2016) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801215599080 · Cited by 69
Belotti, F., Ieracitano, F., Donato, S., & Comunello, F. (2022) · The Communication Review · doi:10.1080/10714421.2022.2033576 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Massey, O. T.
- Venue
- Evaluation and Program Planning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-28
- ISSN
- 0149-7189 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080566528
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 37.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.003
- The paper
- Massey, O. T. (2011). A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research. Evaluation and Program Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
