Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Family counts: deciding when to murder among the Icelandic Vikings

Palmstierna, Markel, Frangou, Anna, Wallette, Anna, Dunbar, Robin·2017·Evolution and Human Behavior

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.09.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Frequency distribution of numbers of murder victims per killer.
Fig. 1 Frequency distribution of numbers of murder victims per killer.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Median (±50 and 95% ranges) total number of kin of all kinds for killers and their victims.
Fig. 2 Median (±50 and 95% ranges) total number of kin of all kinds for killers and their victims.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Mean (±1se) number of kin for killers and their victims as a function of the number of individuals the killer had killed. Although the number of kin victims had is unaffected by their killer's success, the number of kin the killer had increases with the number of victims they had.
Fig. 3 Mean (±1se) number of kin for killers and their victims as a function of the number of individuals the killer had killed. Although the number of kin victims had is unaffected by their killer's success, the number of kin the killer had increases with the number of victims they had.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Killers and victims mapped on the kinship pedigree for the Icelandic Vikings. Colour coding shown in online version. Green nodes are killers; blue nodes are victims. Killer–Victim relations are indicated by red lines, brown lines those that involve multiple individuals. Biological kinship is indicated by blue lines, affines by green lines and foster kin by gray lines.
Fig. 4 Killers and victims mapped on the kinship pedigree for the Icelandic Vikings. Colour coding shown in online version. Green nodes are killers; blue nodes are victims. Killer–Victim relations are indicated by red lines, brown lines those that involve multiple individuals. Biological kinship is indicated by blue lines, affines by green lines and foster kin by gray lines.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Bernstein, 1986, The influence of kinship and socialisation on aggressive behaviour in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), Animal Behaviour, 34, 339, 10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80057-4 · DOI
  2. Betzig, 1986, Food sharing on Ifaluk, Current Anthropology, 27, 397, 10.1086/203457 · DOI
  3. Burton-Chellew, 2011, Are affines treated as biological kin? A test of Hughes' hypothesis, Current Anthropology, 52, 741, 10.1086/661288 · DOI
  4. Daly, 2001, Risk-taking, intrasexual competition, and homicide, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 47, 1
  5. Dunbar, 1995, Conflict and cooperation among the Vikings: Contingent behavioral decisions, Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 233, 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00022-D · DOI
  6. Dunbar, 2010, Bondedness and sociality, Behaviour, 147, 775, 10.1163/000579510X501151 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Firth, 2012, Coercion, vengeance, feud and accommodation: Homicide in medieval Iceland, Early Medieval Europe, 20, 139, 10.1111/j.1468-0254.2012.00339.x · DOI
  8. Gaulin, 1997, Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles: A consequence and measure of paternity uncertainty, Human Nature, 8, 139, 10.1007/s12110-997-1008-4 · DOI
  9. Hames, 1987, Garden labor exchange among the Ye'Kwana, Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 259, 10.1016/0162-3095(87)90028-8 · DOI
  10. Hamilton, 1964, The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I, II, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1, 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hausfater, 1982, Long-term consistency of dominance relations among female baboons (Papio cynocephalus), Science, 217, 752, 10.1126/science.217.4561.752 · DOI
  12. Johnson, 2015, Fight the power: Lanchester's laws of combat in human evolution, Evolution and Human Behaviour, 36, 152, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.11.001 · DOI
  13. Johnson, 1987, Dominance rank in juvenile olive baboons, Papio anubis: the influence of gender, size, maternal rank and orphaning, Animal Behaviour, 35, 1694, 10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80062-3 · DOI
  14. Johnson, 1991, Support and conflict of kinsmen in Norse earldoms, Icelandic families and the English royalty, Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 211, 10.1016/0162-3095(91)90004-A · DOI
  15. Jones, 2000, Group nepotism and human kinship, Current Anthropology, 41, 779, 10.1086/317406 · DOI
  16. Knauft, 1987, Reconsidering violence in simple human societies: Homicide among the Gebusi of new Guinea, Current Anthropology, 28, 457, 10.1086/203549 · DOI
  17. MacCarron, 2013, Network analysis of the Íslendinga sögur – The sagas of Icelanders, European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 86, 407, 10.1140/epjb/e2013-40583-3 · DOI
  18. Macfarlan, 2014, Lethal coalitionary aggression and long-term alliance formation among Yanomamö men, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 16662, 10.1073/pnas.1418639111 · DOI
  19. Madsen, 2007, Kinship and altruism: A cross-cultural experimental study, British journal of psychology, 98, 339, 10.1348/000712606X129213 · DOI
  20. Meyer, 2015, The massacre mass grave of Schöneck-Kilianstädten reveals new insights into collective violence in early Neolithic Central Europe, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 11217, 10.1073/pnas.1504365112 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Miller, 1983, Choosing the avenger: Some aspects of the bloodfeud in medieval Iceland and England., Law and History Review, 1–2, 159, 10.2307/743849 · DOI
  22. Wilson, 2002, Chimpanzees and the mathematics of battle, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 269B, 1107, 10.1098/rspb.2001.1926 · DOI
  23. Wrangham, 1999, The evolution of coalitionary killing, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 42, 1, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(1999)110:29+<1::AID-AJPA2>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Palmstierna, M., Frangou, A., Wallette, A., & Dunbar, R.
Venue
Evolution and Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
175-180
ISSN
1090-5138
Cited by
9
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review