Cited by 773Language and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Did Warfare Among Ancestral Hunter-Gatherers Affect the Evolution of Human Social Behaviors?

Bowles, Samuel·2009·Science

Abstract

War and Peace?: Modern behavior, including the development of advanced tools, musical instruments, and art, seems to have arisen in humans in stages. The earliest hints are seen in Africa about 70 to 90,000 years ago, but later in Europe about 45,000 years ago. An ongoing discussion centers on the origins and significance of human prosociality. During early human development, could the benefits of altruistic behavior have outweighed its costs (see the Perspective by Mace )? Bowles (p. 1293 ) constructed a model of conflict between groups of humans and extracted estimates of the critical parameters from archaeological and ethnographic data sets. Provocatively, it appears that warfare might have enhanced the emergence and persistence of altruistic behavior. Powell et al. (p. 1298 ) present a population model that shows that the development of modern behaviors may rely on the attainment of critical population densities and migratory patterns required for stable cultural transmission. The model is consistent with genetic inferences of population dynamics in Africa and Europe and suggests that these cultural changes may not solely reflect increased cognitive evolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1168112

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Bowles' study, the transmission process is basically genetic.

    “Again, the transmission process in Bowles' study is basically genetic.”

    From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Bowles, 2009

  • The efficiency of cultural transmission has not yet been the focus of these studies.

    “However, the efficiency of cultural transmission has not yet been the focus of these studies.”

    From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Bowles, 2009

  • Intergroup conflict is ubiquitous across human societies and considered crucial for the evolution of humans' large-scale cooperative nature.

    “Intergroup conflict is evident throughout the history of our species, ubiquitous across human societies, and considered crucial for the evolution of humans’ large-scale cooperative nature.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowles, S.
Affiliations
University of Siena (IT)
Corresponding author
Bowles, Samuel
Venue
Science
Published
2009-06-05
Volume
324
Issue
5932
Pages
1293-1298
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1984807806
Cited by
773
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 37
FWCI
896.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
war, hunter-gatherers, prosocial behavior, altruism, cultural evolution, cultural transmission, population density, migration, group conflict, Africa, Europe
MeSH terms
Altruism, Anthropology, Cultural, Archaeology, Cooperative Behavior, Cultural Evolution, Biological Evolution, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Social Behavior, Genetic Variation, Warfare, Microsatellite Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review