The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Müller glia and neuronal progenitors during adult zebrafish retinal regeneration
Open accessAbstract
The adult zebrafish retina exhibits a robust regenerative response following light-induced photoreceptor cell death. This response is initiated by the Müller glia proliferating in the inner nuclear layer (INL), which gives rise to neuronal progenitor cells that continue to divide and migrate to the outer nuclear layer (ONL), where they differentiate into rod and cone photoreceptors. We previously conducted a microarray analysis of retinal gene expression at 16, 31, 51, 68, and 96 hours of constant intense-light treatment to identify genes and their corresponding proteins that may be involved in the generation and proliferation of the neuronal progenitor cells. We examined the expression of two candidate transcription factors, Pax6 and Ngn1, and one candidate transgene, olig2:EGFP, in the regenerating light-damaged retina. We compared the temporal and spatial expression patterns of these markers relative to PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen), an established marker for proliferating cells in the zebrafish retina, and the Tg(gfap:EGFP)nt11 transgenic line that specifically labels Müller glial cells. We found that Müller glial cells dedifferentiate during regeneration, based on the loss of cell-specific markers such as GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein) and glutamine synthetase following their reentry into the cell cycle to produce neuronal progenitors. Pax6 expression was first detected in the proliferating neuronal progenitors by 51 hours of constant light treatment, which is significantly after the Müller glia first reenter the cell cycle after 31 hours of light. This suggests that Pax6 expression increases in neuronal progenitors, rather than in the proliferating Müller glia. EGFP expression from the olig2 promoter was first detected by 68 hours of constant light treatment in the dedifferentiated Müller glia, with Pax6 expressed in the closely-associated proliferating neuronal progenitors migrating to the ONL. Both Pax6 and olig2 expression persisted until three days post light-treatment, when the neuronal progenitors begin differentiating into new rod and cone photoreceptors. Ngn1 protein expression was initially detected in proliferating neuronal progenitors at 68 hours of light treatment. However, Ngn1 expression persisted in a subset of the INL nuclei until 17 days post-light treatment. Using the Tg(gfap:EGFP)nt11 transgenic line, Ngn1 was localized to the Müller glial nuclei that were reestablished following the regenerative response. These markers, therefore, can be used to identify different cell types at particular stages of retinal regeneration: neuronal progenitor formation, proliferation, and the reestablishment of the Müller glia cells. These markers will be important to further characterize the regeneration response in other retinal damage models and to elucidate the defects associated with mutants and morphants that disrupt the regeneration response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The bHLH Transcription Factors OLIG2 and OLIG1 Couple Neuronal and Glial Subtype Specification
Zhou, Q., & Anderson, D. J. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00677-3 · Cited by 1,059 · cited 1×
“Olig2 was originally characterized as a key regulator for the differentiation of progenitor motor neurons (pMN) into either motor neurons or oligodendrocytes (Lee et al., 2005; Lu et al., 2002; Park et al., 2002; Zhou and Anderson, 2002).”
Bernardos, R. L., Barthel, L. K., Meyers, J. R., & Raymond, P. A. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1624-07.2007 · Cited by 647
Regeneration of inner retinal neurons after intravitreal injection of ouabain in zebrafish
Fimbel, S. M., Montgomery, J. E., Burket, C. T., & Hyde, D. R. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5317-06.2007 · Cited by 298
Self-citationKassen, S. C., Ramanan, V., Montgomery, J. E., T. Burket, C., Liu, C., Vihtelic, T. S., & Hyde, D. R. (2007) · Developmental Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/dneu.20362 · Cited by 203
Self-citation
Cited by
Montgomery, J. E., Parsons, M. J., & Hyde, D. R. (2010) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.22243 · Cited by 161
Self-citationβ-catenin/Wnt signaling controls progenitor fate in the developing and regenerating zebrafish retina
Meyers, J. R., Hu, L., Moses, A., Kaboli, K., Papandrea, A., & Raymond, P. A. (2012) · Neural Development · doi:10.1186/1749-8104-7-30 · Cited by 144
Fgf signaling is required for photoreceptor maintenance in the adult zebrafish retina
Hochmann, S., Kaslin, J., Hans, S., Weber, A., Machate, A., Geffarth, M., Funk, R. H. W., & Brand, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030365 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Thummel, R., Kassen, S. C., Enright, J. M., Nelson, C. M., Montgomery, J. E., & Hyde, D. R.
- Venue
- Experimental Eye Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 433-444
- ISSN
- 0014-4835 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989994721
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Müller glia and neuronal progenitors during adult zebrafish retinal regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.exer.2008.07.009
- The paper
- Thummel, R., Kassen, S. C., Enright, J. M., Nelson, C. M., Montgomery, J. E., & Hyde, D. R. (2008). Characterization of Müller glia and neuronal progenitors during adult zebrafish retinal regeneration. Experimental Eye Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2008.07.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.