Cited by 18Corneal Surgery and TreatmentsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceOcular Surface and Contact Lens

A transcriptomic analysis of the EK1.Br strain of human fibroblastoid keratocytes: The effects of growth, quiescence and senescence

Kipling, David, Jones, Dawn L., Smith, S. Kaye, Giles, Peter J., Jennert-Burston, Katrin, Ibrahim, Badr, Sheerin, Angela N.P., Evans, Amy J.C. +2 more·2009·Experimental Eye Research

Abstract

There is a growing need within ocular research for well-defined cellular models of normal corneal biology. To meet this need we created and partially characterised a standard strain of human fibroblastoid keratocytes (EK1.Br) and demonstrated that phenotypic changes occur within these cells with replicative senescence in vitro. Using Affymetrix HG-U133A oligonucleotide arrays, this paper reports both a comprehensive analysis of the transcriptome of EK1.Br in the growing, quiescent and senescent states and a comparison of that transcriptome with those of primary corneal endothelium, lung fibroblasts and dermal fibroblasts grown under identical conditions. Data mining shows (i) that EK1.Br retain the characteristic transcriptional fingerprint of keratocytes in vitro (ii) that this phenotype can be distinguished from those of other 'fibroblasts' by groups of highly differentially expressed genes and (iii) that senescence induces a distinct dedifferentiation phenomenon in EK1.Br. These findings are contextualised into the broader literature on replicative senescence and are supported with a web-accessible and fully searchable public-access database (www.madras.cf.ac.uk/cornea).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exer.2008.11.030

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The composition and intensity of the SASP response can be affected by the senescence-inducing mechanism, cell type, and time since senescence initiation, indicating that there is no singular SASP.

    “The composition and intensity of the SASP response can be affected by several factors including the senescence-inducing mechanism, cell type, and the amount of time passed since senescence initiation, indicating that there is no singular SASP.12–17”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kipling, D., Jones, D. L., Smith, S. K., Giles, P. J., Jennert-Burston, K., Ibrahim, B., Sheerin, A. N. P., Evans, A. J. C., Rhys-Willams, W., & Faragher, R. G. A.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Brighton (GB)
Corresponding author
Faragher, Richard G.A.
Venue
Experimental Eye Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
277-285
ISSN
0014-4835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001294667
Cited by
18
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Eye Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (EGH16151)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Keywords
replicative senescence, corneal endothelium, corneal fibroblasts, transcriptome, gene expression profiling, quiescent cells, dedifferentiation, differentially expressed genes
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, Cell Line, Cornea, Humans, Phenotype, Keratinocytes, Cellular Senescence, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review