Cited by 10Estrogen and related hormone effectsConnexins and lens biologyReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

High affinity nuclear and nongenomic estradiol binding sites in the human and mouse lens

Open access
Kirker, M. Rachel, Gallagher, Katie M., Witt-Enderby, Paula A., Davis, Vicki L.·2013·Experimental Eye Research

Abstract

Estrogen is reported to be protective against cataracts in women and animal models. Immunodetection methods have identified the classic estrogen receptors (ER), ERα and ERβ, in human lens epithelial cells and their RNAs have been detected in the rat and human lens. To verify that estrogen binding occurs in the lens, sensitive [(125)I]-17β-estradiol binding analyses were performed on subcellular lens fractions from women (ages 39-78 years). The presence of high affinity estradiol binding sites in the nuclear, cytoplasmic, and membrane fractions indicate the lens is able to respond to estrogens, even up to age 78, although fewer binding sites were detected in the postmenopausal women. Additionally, due to the importance of mouse models in estrogen action and lens research, lenses from intact female mice were also analyzed. Both the C57BL/6 and FVB/N mouse strains also possessed high affinity binding sites in all three lens fractions. Furthermore, transcripts for ERα, ERβ, and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER; previously called GPR30) that bind estradiol with high affinity were expressed in the human and mouse lenses. These data provide the first evidence of GPER expression in the lens. Its role, functions, and subcellular location are currently unknown, but a G-shift assay in the membrane fractions of human and mouse lenses did not show evidence that estradiol induced classic G protein-coupled receptor activation. All three receptor transcripts were also detected in the lens capsule region isolated from female C57BL/6 mice, which is mainly comprised of epithelial cells. In contrast, only ERα and GPER were expressed in the cortex/nuclear region, which is primarily composed of differentiating and organelle-free fiber cells. No significant differences in specific estradiol binding and receptor RNA expression were observed in the lenses between male and female C57BL/6 mice. These findings indicate that the lens is an estrogen target tissue in both sexes. The identification of GPER, in addition to ERα and ERβ, in the lens also adds to the complexity of possible estrogen responses in the lens. Accordingly, the protective effects of estrogen in women and animals may be mediated by all three estrogen receptors in the lens. In addition, the similarities in binding and receptor RNA expression in the lenses of both species suggest that mice can be used to model estrogen action in the human lens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exer.2013.04.002

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The biological effects of estrogen are mainly mediated via nuclear and membrane estrogen receptors (ERα, ERβ, and GPER), all three of which bind 17β-estradiol with high affinity in the low nM range.

    “The biological effects of estrogen are mainly mediated via nuclear and membrane estrogen receptors (ERs), including estrogen receptor α (ERα), estrogen receptor β (ERβ), and G-protein-coupled ER (GPR30 or GPER), all three bind 17β-estradiol with high affinity in the low nM range (118, 119).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirker, M. R., Gallagher, K. M., Witt-Enderby, P. A., & Davis, V. L.
Affiliations
Duquesne University (US)
Corresponding author
Davis, Vicki L.
Venue
Experimental Eye Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
112
Pages
1-9
ISSN
0014-4835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131736745
Cited by
10
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Eye Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Duquesne University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (R03EY014600, EY014600)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
estradiol binding sites, lens, estrogen receptor, estrogen receptor alpha, estrogen receptor beta, G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, GPR30, non-genomic estrogen signaling, cataract prevention, lens epithelial cells, lens capsule, lens fiber cells, postmenopausal women, estrogen target tissues, mouse model
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Animals, Binding Sites, Cell Membrane, Cell Nucleus, Cytoplasm, Estradiol, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Lens, Crystalline, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Middle Aged, Receptors, Estrogen, RNA, Messenger, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Estrogen Receptor beta, Mice, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review