Cited by 53Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchProbiotics and Fermented FoodsBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

Coaggregation ability of Weissella cibaria isolates with Fusobacterium nucleatum and their adhesiveness to epithelial cells

Kang, Mi-Sun, Na, Hee-Sam, Oh, Jong-Suk·2005·FEMS Microbiology Letters

Abstract

In the present study, we evaluated the ability of Weissella cibaria isolated from the oral cavity to coaggregate with Fusobacterium nucleatum, and the adhesiveness of these strains to epithelial cells. W. cibaria efficiently coaggregated with F. nucleatum, and adhered to epithelial cells. We tested the effects of various factors on the coaggregation. The coaggregation and adhesiveness of W. cibaria disappeared upon exposure to pronase or LiCl, suggesting that proteinaceous components on the surface of W. cibaria mediated the coaggregation and adhesiveness. In conclusion, W. cibaria may serve as a potential probiotic with the ability to establish an oral flora protecting against oral pathogens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.10.002

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selected bacterial strains belonging to the genera Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium have demonstrated a capacity to aggregate with oral pathogens such as Fusobacterium nucleatum or Streptococcus mutans in vitro and in vivo.

    “Selected bacterial strains belonging to the genera Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium have been applied as probiotics and have demonstrated a capacity to aggregate with oral pathogens, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum or Streptococcus mutans, in vitro [8–10] and in vivo [11].”

    From Coaggregation of oral pathogens by postbiotic lactobacilli (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, M.-S., Na, H.-S., & Oh, J.-S.
Affiliations
Chonnam National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Oh, Jong-Suk
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Letters
Published
2005-12
Volume
253
Issue
2
Pages
323-329
ISSN
  • 0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-6968
OpenAlex
W2018567182
Cited by
53
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
Weissella cibaria, Fusobacterium nucleatum, bacterial coaggregation, bacterial adhesion, epithelial cells, oral cavity, probiotics, oral microbiota, surface proteins, oral pathogens
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Bacillus, Bacterial Adhesion, Child, Child, Preschool, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Epithelial Cells, Hot Temperature, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Mouth, Phylogeny, Pronase, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Bacterial Typing Techniques, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review