Cited by 46Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Interactions between salivary Bifidobacterium adolescentis and other oral bacteria: in vitro coaggregation and coadhesion assays: Coaggregation and coadhesion of oral bifidobacteria

Nagaoka, Seiji, Hojo, Kenichi, Murata, Saori, Mori, Takeshi, Ohshima, Tomoko, Maeda, Nobuko·2008·FEMS Microbiology Letters

Abstract

Coaggregation assays were performed to investigate interactions between oral Bifidobacterium adolescentis and other oral bacterial species. Bifidobacterium adolescentis OLB6410 isolated from the saliva of healthy humans did not coaggregate with Actinomyces naeslundii JCM8350, Streptococcus mitis OLS3293, Streptococcus sanguinis JCM5708, Veillonella parvula ATCC17745 or Porphyromonas gingivalis OB7124, but it did coaggregate with Fusobacterium nucleatum JCM8532. Subsequent examination of biofilm formation on saliva-coated hydroxyapatite discs using FISH revealed that B. adolescentis OLB6410 could not directly adhere to the coated discs. It did, however, adhere to biofilms of A. naeslundii, V. parvula, and F. nucleatum, although it did not coaggregate with A. naeslundii nor with V. parvula. These results suggest that the adhesion of B. adolescentis to tooth surfaces is mediated by other oral bacteria. Heat- or proteinase K-treated F. nucleatum could not coaggregate with B. adolescentis. Similarly, the coaggregation and coadhesion of proteinase K-treated B. adolescentis were strongly inhibited. It is therefore probable that proteinaceous factors on the cellular surface of B. adolescentis and F. nucleatum are involved in their interaction. The data presented in this study add to our understanding of bifidobacterial colonization in the human oral cavity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01092.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selected bacterial strains belonging to the genera Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium have demonstrated a capacity to aggregate with oral pathogens such as Fusobacterium nucleatum or Streptococcus mutans in vitro and in vivo.

    “Selected bacterial strains belonging to the genera Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium have been applied as probiotics and have demonstrated a capacity to aggregate with oral pathogens, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum or Streptococcus mutans, in vitro [8–10] and in vivo [11].”

    From Coaggregation of oral pathogens by postbiotic lactobacilli (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagaoka, S., Hojo, K., Murata, S., Mori, T., Ohshima, T., & Maeda, N.
Affiliations
  • Meiji (Japan) (JP)
  • Tsurumi University (JP)
Corresponding author
Hojo, Kenichi
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Letters
Published
2008-04
Volume
281
Issue
2
Pages
183-189
ISSN
  • 0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-6968
OpenAlex
W1838542403
Cited by
46
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
Bifidobacterium adolescentis, oral bacteria, co-aggregation, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Actinomyces naeslundii, Veillonella parvula, Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus mitis, Porphyromonas gingivalis, biofilm formation, bacterial adhesion, saliva, oral colonization, proteinase K, heat treatment (food and biological processing)
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Bacterial Adhesion, Bifidobacterium, Hot Temperature, Humans, Mouth, Saliva, Fusobacterium nucleatum, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Biofilms, Endopeptidase K

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review