The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a prokaryotic genomic taxonomy
Abstract
One of the most interesting developments in the field of modern-day microbiology is the ever increasing number of whole-genome sequences that is publicly available. There is an increasing interest in the use of these genome sequences to assess evolutionary relationships among microbial taxa, as it is anticipated that much additional taxonomic information can be extracted from these sequences. In a first part of the present review, mechanisms that are responsible for the evolution of genomes will be discussed. Subsequently, we will give an overview of approaches that are presently available to assess the taxonomic relationships between prokaryotic species based on complete genome sequences, followed by a brief discussion of the potential implications of these novel approaches for bacterial taxonomy in general and our thinking about the bacterial species concept in particular.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prokaryotes: The unseen majority
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871 · cited 2×
“[185] Whitman, W.”
BackgroundEnvironmental genome shotgun sequencing of the sargasso sea
Venter, J. C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J. F., Halpern, A. L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J. A., Wu, D., Paulsen, I., Nelson, K. E., Nelson, W., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093857 · Cited by 4,376
Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation
Ochman, H., Lawrence, J. G., & Groisman, E. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012500 · Cited by 3,816
Massive gene decay in the leprosy bacillus.
Cole, S. T., Eiglmeier, K., Parkhill, J., James, K. D., Thomson, N. R., Wheeler, P. R., Honoré, N., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35059006 · Cited by 1,777
Yersinia pestis , the cause of plague, is a recently emerged clone of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis
Achtman, M., Zurth, K., Morelli, G., Torrea, G., Guiyoule, A., & Carniel, E. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.24.14043 · Cited by 1,126
Parkhill, J., Sebaihia, M., Preston, A., Murphy, L. D., Thomson, N., Harris, D. E., Holden, M. T. G., Churcher, C. M., Bentley, S. D., Mungall, K. L., et al. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1227 · Cited by 1,037
Prokaryotic Evolution in Light of Gene Transfer
Gogarten, J. P., Doolittle, W. F., & Lawrence, J. G. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004046 · Cited by 986
Comparative genomics, minimal gene-sets and the last universal common ancestor
Koonin, E. V. (2003) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro751 · Cited by 661
Mirkin, B. G., Fenner, T. I., Galperin, M. Y., & Koonin, E. V. (2003) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-3-2 · Cited by 368
Analysis of the proteome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in silico
Tekaia, F., Gordon, S. V., Garnier, T., Brosch, R., Barrell, B. G., & Cole, S. T. (1999) · Tubercle and Lung Disease · doi:10.1054/tuld.1999.0220 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- COENYE, T., GEVERS, D., DEPEER, Y., VANDAMME, P., & SWINGS, J.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-167
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129233533
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a prokaryotic genomic taxonomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.11.004
- The paper
- COENYE, T., GEVERS, D., DEPEER, Y., VANDAMME, P., & SWINGS, J. (2005). Towards a prokaryotic genomic taxonomy. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.11.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
