Cited by 81Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Using location, color, size, and depth to characterize and identify endometriosis lesions in a cohort of 133 women

Open access
Stegmann, Barbara J., Sinaii, Ninet, Liu, Shannon, Segars, James, Merino, Maria, Nieman, Lynnette K., Stratton, Pamela·2008·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To correlate histology with endometriosis characteristics. Design Secondary data analysis. Setting Government research hospital. Patient(s) One hundred thirty-three women with chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic surgery between 1999 and 2004. Intervention(s) Laparoscopic excision of lesions, including recording of lesion characteristics and surgical impression of the lesions. Main outcome measure(s) All biopsies were sent for histological examination for endometriosis, and surgical and histological findings were compared. Result(s) Three hundred fifty-seven of 544 lesions believed to be endometriosis by the surgeon had positive histology. Mixed-color lesions most commonly contained endometriosis (76%), with the percentage of positive lesions being similar between single-color groups. Among subtle (red or white) lesions, 58% (164/283) were positive for endometriosis. Thirty women had only red or white lesions, and 18 (60%) had at least one lesion positive for endometriosis. Lesions were most commonly located in the cul-de-sac (64%), utero-sacral ligaments (68%), and ovarian fossa (70%). Conclusion(s) Wide, deep, mixed-color lesions in the cul-de-sac, the ovarian fossa, or the utero-sacral ligaments had the highest frequency of endometriosis. More than half of subtle lesions had endometriosis. These results should be considered when diagnosing endometriosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.042

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biopsy-proven endometriosis occurs at similar frequency across single-color lesions and most often in mixed-color lesions.

    “the frequency of biopsy-proven endometriosis is similar among all single-colored lesions and highest in mixed-color lesions”
  • The same HPA dysfunction likely applies to endometriosis and chronic pain.

    “The same situation likely applies to endometriosis and chronic pain (Stegmann et al., 2008a).”

    From Chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis: translational evidence of the relationship and implications (2011) · cites this paper as Stegmann et al., 2008a

    The Methods and Discussion describe women with chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis, but do not address HPA-axis dysfunction. Searches for HPA, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal, cortisol, and stress returned no passage supporting the proposed connection. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, D'Hooghe T, Dunselman G, Greb R, et al. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endo- metriosis. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2698-704.
  2. Stratton P, Winkel CA, Sinaii N, Merino MJ, Zimmer C, Nieman LK. Location, color, size, depth, and volume may predict endometriosis in lesions resected at surgery. Fertil Steril 2002;78:743-9.
  3. Martin DC. Endometriosis: correlation between histologic and visual find- ings at laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1663-4.
  4. Walter AJ, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Cornella JL, Magrina JF. Endome- triosis: correlation between histologic and visual findings at laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1407-11 [discussion: 11-3].
  5. Stripling MC, Martin DC, Chatman DL, Zwaag RV, Poston WM. Sub- tle appearance of pelvic endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1988;49:427-31.
  6. Wykes CB, Clark TJ, Khan KS. Accuracy of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic quantitative review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;111:1204-12.
  7. Wolfler MM, Nagele F, Kolbus A, Seidl S, Schneider B, Huber JC, et al. A predictive model for endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1702-8.
  8. Stratton P, Winkel C, Premkumar A, Chow C, Wilson J, Hearns- Stokes R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathologic examination for the detection of endome- triosis. Fertil Steril 2003;79:1078-85.
  9. Missmer SA, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, Marshall LM, Hunter DJ. Incidence of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis by demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160:784-96.
  10. Missmer SA, Cramer DW. The epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2003;30:1-19, vii.
  11. Kinkel K, Frei KA, Balleyguier C, Chapron C. Diagnosis of endometri- osis with imaging: a review. Eur Radiol 2006;16:285-98.
  12. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Revised American Soci- ety for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril 1997;67:817-21.
  13. Potlog-Nahari C, Feldman AL, Stratton P, Koziol DE, Segars J, Merino MJ, et al. CD10 immunohistochemical staining enhances the histological detection of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2004;82: 86-92.
  14. Calhaz-Jorge C, Mol BW, Nunes J, Costa AP. Clinical predictive factors for endometriosis in a Portuguese infertile population. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2126-31.
  15. Chapron C, Barakat H, Fritel X, Dubuisson JB, Breart G, Fauconnier A. Presurgical diagnosis of posterior deep infiltrating en- dometriosis based on a standardized questionnaire. Hum Reprod 2005;20:507-13.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stegmann, B. J., Sinaii, N., Liu, S., Segars, J., Merino, M., Nieman, L. K., & Stratton, P.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Stratton, Pamela
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
89
Issue
6
Pages
1632-1636
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046381495
Cited by
81
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • NIH Clinical Center
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Z01HD008728)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, lesion color, lesion localization, lesion depth, lesion size, histopathological confirmation, laparoscopic resection, chronic pelvic pain, cul-de-sac
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Urinary Bladder, Endometriosis, Estrogen Antagonists, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovary, Laparoscopy, Uterus, Cohort Studies, Raloxifene Hydrochloride

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review