Cited by 34Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsSperm and Testicular FunctionAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

The influence of sperm morphology on preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles outcome

Open access
Dubey, Anil, Dayal, Molina B., Frankfurter, David, Balazy, Pauline, Peak, Douglas, Gindoff, Paul R.·2008·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the impact of abnormal sperm morphology on the rates of aneuploidy, implantation, and clinical pregnancy. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting University-based IVF center. Patient(s) Fifty-two patients undergoing their first IVF-preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) cycle. Intervention(s) The PGD analysis of embryos. Main outcome measure(s) Patients were divided into two groups based on sperm morphology: teratospermic group (TSG) and normal sperm group (NSG). The primary outcome measures of rates of aneuploidy, implantation, clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per cycle, and clinical PR per embryo transfer were compared between TSG and NSG according to PGD analysis results. Results A higher percentage of normal embryos was seen in the NSG (32%) versus the TSG (20%). Overall, 30% of IVF-PGD cycles had no normal embryos for transfer. The clinical PR per cycle was 44% in the NSG compared to 14% in the TSG (relative risk [RR] = 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-9.0). A similar trend was noted with the clinical PR per embryo transfer with 57% patients becoming pregnant in the NSG versus 20% patients in the TSG (RR = 2.76; 95% CI 1.2-7.2). Implantation was twice as likely to occur in the NSG as compared to TSG (RR = 2.5; 95% CI 1.1-7.2). Conclusion(s) Rates of euploidy, implantation, clinical PR per cycle, and clinical PR per embryo transfer were higher in the NSG compared to the TSG, suggesting that sperm morphology plays an important role in the outcome of IVF-PGD cycles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.052

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pathophysiological studies have shown sometimes controversial associations between sperm morphology and sperm competence (aptitude to undergo the acrosomal reaction, DNA integrity, chromatin condensation, etc.).

    “Sperm morphology assessment has also been examined in numerous pathophysiological studies that have shown sometimes controversial associations between morphology and sperm competence (aptitude to undergo the acrosomal reaction, DNA integrity, chromatin condensation, etc.) [5, 6, 7, 8].”

    From Recommendations for Human Sperm Morphology Assessment in 2025: An Expert Review From the French BLEFCO Group (2026) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says studies of sperm morphology and chromosomal integrity have reached inconsistent conclusions, supporting the claim’s general point about controversial associations. It does not address the cited examples of acrosomal reaction or chromatin condensation, and its mention of DNA fragmentation does not establish an association with morphology. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Munn e S, Magli C, Bache M, Fung J, Legator M, Morrison L, et al. Pre- implantation diagnosis of the aneuploidies most commonly found in spontaneous abortions and live births: XY, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22. Prenat Diagn 1998;18:1459-66.
  2. Silber S, Escudero T, Lenahan K, Abdelhadi I, Kilani Z, Munn e S. Chro- mosomal abnormalities in embryos derived from testicular sperm extrac- tion. Fertil Steril 2003;79:30-8.
  3. Velilla E, Escudero T, Munn e S. Blastomere fixation techniques and risk of misdiagnosis for PGD of aneuploidies. Reprod Biomed Online 2002;4:210-7.
  4. Bache M, Escudero T, Sandalinas M, Fung J, Morrison L, Legator M, et al. Improvements of preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy by using microwave-hybridization cell recycling and mono-color labeling of probes. Mol Hum Reprod 2000;9:849-54.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dubey, A., Dayal, M. B., Frankfurter, D., Balazy, P., Peak, D., & Gindoff, P. R.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Dubey, Anil
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
89
Issue
6
Pages
1665-1669
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134448627
Cited by
34
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
sperm morphology, teratozoospermia, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, aneuploidy, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, embryo quality, IVF outcomes, embryo transfer
MeSH terms
Adult, Aneuploidy, Blastocyst, Embryo, Mammalian, Embryo Transfer, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Male, Oocytes, Embryo Implantation, Pregnancy, Spermatozoa, Pregnancy Rate, Preimplantation Diagnosis, Oocyte Retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review