The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether incubation in the integrated EmbryoScope time-lapse monitoring system (TMS) and selection supported by the use of a multivariable morphokinetic model improve reproductive outcomes in comparison with incubation in a standard incubator (SI) embryo culture and selection based exclusively on morphology. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study. SETTING: University-affiliated private in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic. PATIENT(S): Eight hundred forty-three infertile couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). INTERVENTION(S): No patient intervention; embryos cultured in SI with development evaluated only by morphology (control group) and embryos cultured in TMS with embryo selection was based on a multivariable model (study group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rates of embryo implantation, pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy (OPR), and early pregnancy loss. RESULT(S): Analyzing per treated cycle, the ongoing pregnancy rate was statistically significantly increased 51.4% (95% CI, 46.7-56.0) for the TMS group compared with 41.7% (95% CI, 36.9-46.5) for the SI group. For pregnancy rate, differences were not statistically significant at 61.6% (95% CI, 56.9-66.0) versus 56.3% (95% CI, 51.4-61.0). The results per transfer were similar: statistically significant differences in ongoing pregnancy rate of 54.5% (95% CI, 49.6-59.2) versus 45.3% (95% CI, 40.3-50.4) and not statistically significant for pregnancy rate at 65.2% (95% CI, 60.6-69.8) versus 61.1% (95% CI, 56.2-66.1). Early pregnancy loss was statistically significantly decreased for the TMS group with 16.6% (95% CI, 12.6-21.4) versus 25.8% (95% CI, 20.6-31.9). The implantation rate was statistically significantly increased at 44.9% (95% CI, 41.4-48.4) versus 37.1% (95% CI, 33.6-40.7). CONCLUSION(S): The strategy of culturing and selecting embryos in the integrated EmbryoScope time-lapse monitoring system improves reproductive outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01549262.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation
Meseguer, M., Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Hilligsoe, K. M., Ramsing, N. B., & Remohi, J. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der256 · Cited by 913
Self-citationWong, C. C., Loewke, K. E., Bossert, N. L., Behr, B., De Jonge, C. J., Baer, T. M., & Pera, R. A. R. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1686 · Cited by 783
Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting
Medicine, A. S. I. R., & ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology (2011) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.02.001 · Cited by 567
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE
Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V., Ferraretti, A. P., Bhattacharya, S., Felberbaum, R., de Mouzon, J., Nygren, K. G., & The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, F. T. E. S. O. H. R. A. E. (. (2008) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/den014 · Cited by 566
Cobo, A., Kuwayama, M., Pérez, S., Ruiz, A., Pellicer, A., & Remohí, J. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.050 · Cited by 565
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2003
Anderssen, A. N., Goossens, V., Gianaroli, L., Felberbaum, R. E., de Mouzon, J., & Nygren, K. G. (2007) · STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) · Cited by 441
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE
de Mouzon, J., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., Castilla, J. A., Ferraretti, A. P., Korsak, V., Kupka, M., Nygren, K. G., Nyboe Andersen, A., & The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, F. T. E. S. O. H. R. A. E. (. (2010) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deq124 · Cited by 414
Female obesity impairs in vitro fertilization outcome without affecting embryo quality
Bellver, J., Ayllón, Y., Ferrando, M., Melo, M., Goyri, E., Pellicer, A., Remohí, J., & Meseguer, M. (2010) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.032 · Cited by 367
Self-citationModelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics
Campbell, A., Fishel, S., Bowman, N., Duffy, S., Sedler, M., & Hickman, C. F. L. (2013) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.006 · Cited by 360
Meseguer, M., Rubio, I., Cruz, M., Basile, N., Marcos, J., & Requena, A. (2012) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.016 · Cited by 327
Self-citation
Cited by
Tran, D., Cooke, S., Illingworth, P. J., & Gardner, D. K. (2019) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dez064 · Cited by 312
Nikolova, S., Parvanov, D., Georgieva, V., Ivanova, I., Ganeva, R., & Stamenov, G. (2020) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12781 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubio, I., Galán, A., Larreategui, Z., Ayerdi, F., Bellver, J., Herrero, J., & Meseguer, M.
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1287-1294.e5
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057755432
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 37.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.738
- The paper
- Rubio, I., Galán, A., Larreategui, Z., Ayerdi, F., Bellver, J., Herrero, J., & Meseguer, M. (2014). Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. Fertility and Sterility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.738
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.