Cited by 24Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive Health and Technologies

Impact of sperm characteristics on time‐lapse embryo morphokinetic parameters and clinical outcome of conventional in vitro fertilization

Open access
Nikolova, Stefka, Parvanov, Dimitar, Georgieva, Vilyana, Ivanova, Ivka, Ganeva, Rumiana, Stamenov, Georgi·2020·Andrology

Abstract

Background: Sperm abnormalities may negatively affect embryo development. Objectives: To determine the influence of sperm abnormalities (morphology, motility, DNA fragmentation) on embryo morphokinetic variables and clinical outcome of conventional IVF. Materials and methods: Participants were 86 couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Sperm morphology was evaluated according to the strict criteria proposed by Kruger/Tygerberg. CASA system was applied for sperm motility assessment. Sperm DNA fragmentation was assessed by the chromatin structure assay (SCSA). Morphokinetic parameters were determined in 223 embryos obtained from conventional IVF only and cultured in a single‐step medium using time‐lapse imaging technology. Results: Time‐lapse variables from the initial embryo development, such as time of pronuclei fading (tPNf) and time for two cells (t2), were those more strongly related with abnormalities of sperm motility, morphology, and DNA fragmentation. Sperm morphological abnormalities rather than sperm motility were more closely associated with embryo morphokinetics. Sperm head defects were mainly correlated with the last stages of embryonic development (t9 to tHB), sperm midpiece defects with intermediate cleaving embryos (t5‐t9), and sperm tail defects with the initial stages of embryonic development (tPNa‐t4). Excess residual cytoplasm was positively correlated with all embryo morphokinetic parameters except t2 and tM. Absence of acrosomes, pinheads, coiled tails, and multiple sperm morphological defects correlated negatively with time‐lapse embryo morphokinetic variables. Discussion: A large number of sperm‐related variables, including frequency of specific morphological defects, morphological indexes, DNA fragmentation and motility, and time‐lapse embryo variables, such as time intervals based mainly of 15 time points were recorded. Conclusion: There were strong associations between specific sperm defects of the head, midpiece, and tail with certain stages of embryonic development from observation of pronuclei to the hatched blastocyst. Coiled tail, cumulative head defects, and multiple abnormalities index (MAI) were associated both with embryo morphokinetics and the implantation success.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/andr.12781

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nikolova et al. examined implantation rate after single embryo transfer in 86 couples and found that abnormalities of the head or the flagellum or high MAI appeared to be predictive of a lower success rate.

    “Nikolova et al. [27] examined the implantation rate after single embryo transfer in 86 couples (42 successful vs. 44 unsuccessful implantations). Abnormalities of the head (vacuoles, wide acrosome) or the flagellum (coiled tail) or high MAI appeared to be predictive of a lower success rate.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dariš B, Goropevšek A, Hojnik N, Vlaisavljević V. Sperm morpho- logical abnormaities as indicators of DNA fragmentation and fertil- ization in ICSI. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281:363-367.
  2. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing for Human Semen, 5th edn. Switzerland: WHO Press; 2010:223-225.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nikolova, S., Parvanov, D., Georgieva, V., Ivanova, I., Ganeva, R., & Stamenov, G.
Affiliations
  • Embryology Department Nadezhda Women’s Health Hospital Sofia Bulgaria
  • Research Department Nadezhda Women’s Health Hospital Sofia Bulgaria
  • Andrology Department Nadezhda Women’s Health Hospital Sofia Bulgaria
  • Obsterics and Gynecology Department Nadezhda Women’s Health Hospital Sofia Bulgaria
Corresponding author
Parvanov, Dimitar
Venue
Andrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-03-30
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
1107-1116
ISSN
  • 2047-2919 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-2927
OpenAlex
W3010135326
Cited by
24
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Andrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
sperm abnormalities, sperm morphology, sperm motility, sperm DNA fragmentation, embryo morphokinetics, time-lapse embryo imaging, IVF outcomes, implantation success, acrosome defects, blastocyst development
MeSH terms
Adult, Embryo, Mammalian, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Male, Embryo Implantation, Pregnancy, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Treatment Outcome, Embryonic Development, DNA Fragmentation, Time-Lapse Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review