The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics
Open accessAbstract
This study determined whether morphokinetic variables between aneuploid and euploid embryos differ as a potential aid to select euploid embryos for transfer. Following insemination, EmbryoScope time-lapse images from 98 blastocysts were collected and analysed blinded to ploidy. The morphokinetic variables were retrospectively compared with ploidy, which was determined following trophectoderm biopsy and analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization or single-nucleotide polymorphic array. Multiple aneuploid embryos were delayed at the initiation of compaction ( t SC ; median 85.1 hours post insemination (hpi); P =0.02) and the time to reach full blastocyst stage ( t B ; median 110.9hpi, P =0.01) compared with euploid embryos ( t SC median 79.7 hpi, t B median 105.9 hpi). Embryos having single or multiple aneuploidy (median 103.4 hpi, P =0.004 and 101.9 hpi, P =0.006, respectively) had delayed initiation of blastulation compared with euploid embryos (median 95.1hpi). No significant differences were observed in first or second cell-cycle length, synchrony of the second or third cell cycles, duration of blastulation, multinucleation at the 2-cell stage and irregular division patterns between euploid and aneuploid embryos. This non-invasive model for ploidy classification may be used to avoid selecting embryos with high risk of aneuploidy while selecting those with reduced risk. Chromosome anomalies (aneuploidy) are prevalent in human embryos and result in either IVF failure, miscarriage or the birth of children with chromosome disorders. After IVF, it is imperative to try to detect aneuploid embryos in order to transfer an embryo with a normal chromosome copy number (euploid) to maximize the chances of a successful and healthy live birth. Currently, the only option is to biopsy a cell (or cells) from the embryo and analyse these using complex and expensive genetic technology. Novel uninterrupted culturing methods using the EmbryoScope now enables detailed observation of the each embryo via time-lapse photography during the whole culture period, for up to 6days. This new technology has permitted us to observe the development of human embryos in detail after IVF, providing analysis of complex patterns of cell division and cell movement (morphokinetics). As far as is known for the first time, we have demonstrated differences between aneuploid and euploid embryos based on their morphokinetic patterns, whereby aneuploid embryos are significantly delayed in reaching the later stages of development, during days 4 and 5 in culture. We postulate that, by using the unique, non-invasive and specifically designed models or algorithms developed in this study, embryologists can make more informed choices on the most viable embryo to select for transfer and reduce the risk of selecting an aneuploid embryo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, Balaban, B., Brison, D., Calderon, G., Catt, J., Conaghan, J., Cowan, L., Ebner, T., Gardner, D., Hardarson, T., et al. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der037 · Cited by 2,015
Cohesin: Its Roles and Mechanisms
Nasmyth, K., & Haering, C. H. (2009) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233 · Cited by 974
The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation
Meseguer, M., Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Hilligsoe, K. M., Ramsing, N. B., & Remohi, J. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der256 · Cited by 913
Wong, C. C., Loewke, K. E., Bossert, N. L., Behr, B., De Jonge, C. J., Baer, T. M., & Pera, R. A. R. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1686 · Cited by 783
Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting
Medicine, A. S. I. R., & ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology (2011) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.02.001 · Cited by 567
Cummins, J. M., Breen, T. M., Harrison, K. L., Shaw, J. M., Wilson, L. M., & Hennessey, J. F. (1986) · Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer · doi:10.1007/bf01133388 · Cited by 560
Yang, Z., Liu, J., Collins, G. S., Salem, S. A., Liu, X., Lyle, S. S., Peck, A. C., Sills, E. S., & Salem, R. D. (2012) · Molecular Cytogenetics · doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-24 · Cited by 545
Munné, S., Lee, A., Rosenwaks, Z., Grifo, J., & Cohen, J. (1993) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138001 · Cited by 514
The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender
Alfarawati, S., Fragouli, E., Colls, P., Stevens, J., Gutiérrez-Mateo, C., Schoolcraft, W. B., Katz-Jaffe, M. G., & Wells, D. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003 · Cited by 422
Meseguer, M., Rubio, I., Cruz, M., Basile, N., Marcos, J., & Requena, A. (2012) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.016 · Cited by 327
Cited by
Rubio, I., Galán, A., Larreategui, Z., Ayerdi, F., Bellver, J., Herrero, J., & Meseguer, M. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.738 · Cited by 314
Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos
Fragouli, E., Alfarawati, S., Spath, K., & Wells, D. (2014) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gat073 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, A., Fishel, S., Bowman, N., Duffy, S., Sedler, M., & Hickman, C. F. L.
- Venue
- Reproductive BioMedicine Online
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 477-485
- ISSN
- 1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008829093
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 36.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.006
- The paper
- Campbell, A., Fishel, S., Bowman, N., Duffy, S., Sedler, M., & Hickman, C. F. L. (2013). Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.