The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion
Open accessAbstract
In the United States, economic, racial, ethnic, geographic, and other disparities prevent access to fertility treatment and affect treatment outcomes. This opinion examines the factors that contribute to these disparities, proposes actions to address them, and replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2015.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Accessibility and utilization are affected by physical features of clinics (e.g. access for the disabled, male services available only in female clinics), limitation of reproductive health information, and a regulatory environment that might restrict services and/or discriminate, e.g. LGBTQ+ or single people (ASRM The Ethics Committee, 2021; Oliveira et al., 2021).”
From Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as ASRM The Ethics Committee, 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Distinct disparities in infertility care exist, largely due to barriers to access aligned with race, class, socioeconomic status, gender, sexual orientation, and other forms of difference (ASRM The Ethics Committee, 2021).”
From Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as ASRM The Ethics Committee, 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Due to high cost and/or unaffordability, ART remains out of reach for many, even in resource-rich countries (Dyer et al., 2020; ASRM The Ethics Committee, 2021; Njagi et al., 2023).”
From Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as ASRM The Ethics Committee, 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Ishihara, O., Mansour, R. T., Nygren, K. G., Sullivan, E. A., & Vanderpoel, S. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009 · Cited by 1,895
Health disparities and health equity: Concepts and measurement
Braveman, P. (2006) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102103 · Cited by 1,570
The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017
Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., Dyer, S., Racowsky, C., de Mouzon, J., Sokol, R., Rienzi, L., Sunde, A., Schmidt, L., Cooke, I. D., et al. (2017) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005 · Cited by 1,505
The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature
Greil, A. L., Slauson-Blevins, K., & McQuillan, J. (2010) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01213.x · Cited by 867
Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion
(2020) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025 · Cited by 639
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE
Kupka, M. S., Ferraretti, A. P., de Mouzon, J., Erb, K., D’Hooghe, T. M., Castilla, J. A., Calhaz–Jorge, C., Geyter, C. D., Goossens, V., Strohmer, H., et al. (2014) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deu175 · Cited by 461
The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries
Chambers, G. M., Sullivan, E. A., Ishihara, O., Chapman, M. G., & Adamson, G. D. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.029 · Cited by 438
Cultural competence education for health professionals
Horvat, L., Horey, D., Romios, P., & Kis‐Rigo, J. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009405.pub2 · Cited by 436
The psychological impact of infertility: a comparison with patients with other medical conditions.
Domar, A. D., Zuttermeister, P. C., & Friedman, R. B. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 353
Insurance Coverage and Outcomes of in Vitro Fertilization
Jain, T., Harlow, B. L., & Hornstein, M. D. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa013491 · Cited by 310
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942). Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8050731321644873759&q=Skinner+v.+Oklahoma,+316+U.S.+535+(1942)&hl=en&as_sdt=80006&as_vis=1. Accessed June 2, 2021
- 2014, ACOG committee opinion no. 586: health disparities in rural women, Obstet Gynecol, 123, 384, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000443278.06393.d6 · DOI
- Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Access to fertility treatment irrespective of marital status, sexual orientation, or gender identity: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. In press.
- Curtis, 2018, Inconceivable: how barriers to infertility treatment for low-income women amount to reproductive oppression, Geo J on Poverty L & Pol’y, XXV, 323
- American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility evaluation of the infertile woman: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. In press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fauser, B. C. J. M., Adamson, G. D., Boivin, J., Chambers, G. M., de Geyter, C., Dyer, S., Inhorn, M. C., Schmidt, L., Serour, G. I., Tarlatzis, B., et al. (2024) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmad028 · Cited by 224
“Distinct disparities in infertility care exist, largely due to barriers to access aligned with race, class, socioeconomic status, gender, sexual orientation, and other forms of difference (ASRM The Ethics Committee, 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialPeipert, B. J., Montoya, M. N., Bedrick, B. S., Seifer, D. B., & Jain, T. (2022) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/s12958-022-00984-5 · Cited by 77
Patrizio, P., Albertini, D. F., Gleicher, N., & Caplan, A. L. (2022) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-022-02399-y · Cited by 65
Morshed-Behbahani, B., Lamyian, M., Joulaei, H., Rashidi, B. H., & Montazeri, A. (2020) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-020-00617-9 · Cited by 45
Racial disparities in access to reproductive health and fertility care in the United States
Beroukhim, G., Mahabamunuge, J., & Pal, L. (2022) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000780 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-63
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205755962
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 16.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Keywords
- access to fertility treatment, health disparities, racial and ethnic disparities, socioeconomic disparities, geographic disparities, treatment outcomes, health equity
- MeSH terms
- Race Factors, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Infertility, Insurance, Health, Male, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, United States, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Risk Assessment, Insurance Coverage, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Ethics Committees, Clinical, Healthcare Disparities, Social Determinants of Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
