Cited by 867Reproductive Health and TechnologiesFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature

Open access
Greil, Arthur L., Slauson-Blevins, Kathleen, McQuillan, Julia·2010·Sociology of Health & Illness

Abstract

About 10 years ago Greil published a review and critique of the literature on the socio-psychological impact of infertility. He found at the time that most scholars treated infertility as a medical condition with psychological consequences rather than as a socially constructed reality. This article examines research published since the last review. More studies now place infertility within larger social contexts and social scientific frameworks although clinical emphases persist. Methodological problems remain but important improvements are also evident. We identify two vigorous research traditions in the social scientific study of infertility. One tradition uses primarily quantitative techniques to study clinic patients in order to improve service delivery and to assess the need for psychological counselling. The other tradition uses primarily qualitative research to capture the experiences of infertile people in a sociocultural context. We conclude that more attention is now being paid to the ways in which the experience of infertility is shaped by social context. We call for continued progress in the development of a distinctly sociological approach to infertility and for the continued integration of the two research traditions identified here.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01213.x

Cites

171 of 171 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Conrad P Schneider JW 1980 The Medicalisation of Deviance: From Badness to Sickness St Louis, MO Mosby
  2. Culley L Hudson N 2006 Disrupted reproduction and deviant bodies: pronatalism and British South Asian communities International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations 5 2 117 26
  3. Edelmann RJ Connolly KJ 1998 Psychological state and psychological strain in relation to infertility Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 8 4 303 11
  4. Feldman-Savelsberg P 2002 Is infertility an unrecognized public health and population problem?: The view from the Cameroon grass fields Inhorn MC van Balen F Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies: A View from the Social Sciences Berkeley, CA University of California Press
  5. Greil AL Inhorn MC van Balen F 2002 Infertile bodies: medicalization, metaphor, and agency Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies: A View from the Social Sciences Berkeley, CA University of California Press
  6. Jenkins GL Inhorn MC van Balen F 2002 Childlessness, adoption, and Milagros de Dios in Costa Rica Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies: A View from the Social Sciences Berkeley, CA University of California Press
  7. Leonard L Inhorn MC van Balen F 2002b Problematizing fertility: ‘scientific’ accounts and Chadian women’s narratives Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies: A View from the Social Sciences Berkeley, CA University of California Press
  8. Nahar P 2007 Childless in Bangladesh: suffering and resilience among rural and urban women PhD dissertation Amsterdam University of Amsterdam
  9. Pashigian MJ Inhorn MC van Balen F 2002 Conceiving the happy family: infertility and marital politics in northern Vietnam Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Child-lessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies: A View from the Social Sciences Berkeley, CA University of California Press
  10. Riessman CK Inhorn MC van Balen F 2002 Positioning gender identity in narratives of infertility: south Indian women’s lives in context Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies: A View from the Social Sciences Berkeley, CA University of California Press
  11. Strauss B Hepp U Staeding G Mettler L 1998 Psychological characteristics of infertile couples: can they predict pregnancy and treatment persistence? Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 8 44 289 301
  12. Sundby J Inhorn MC van Balen F 2002 Infertility and healthcare in countries with less resources Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies: A View from the Social Sciences Berkeley, CA University of California Press
  13. van Balen F Inhorn MC van Balen F 2002 The psychologization of infertility Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies: A View from the Social Sciences Berkeley, CA University of California Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greil, A. L., Slauson-Blevins, K., & McQuillan, J.
Affiliations
  • Alfred University (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
Sociology of Health & Illness
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
140-162
ISSN
  • 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9566
OpenAlex
W2155246851
Cited by
867
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 30
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sociology of Health & Illness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD044144)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Keywords
infertility, psychosocial impact, social construction of illness, sociocultural context, psychological counselling, fertility clinics, qualitative research, quantitative research
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Culture, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Infertility, Male, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Marriage, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Prejudice, Stress, Psychological, Directive Counseling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review