The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The sixth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: ensuring quality and standardization in basic examination of human ejaculates
Open accessAbstract
A basic semen investigation has established principles that are necessary for ascertaining reliable and internationally comparable results. Although these principles have been present in the WHO manual since its inception, the baseline issue across most published studies and practice in reproductive medicine (in which the male is considered) is repetitive failure to adhere to these principles, thereby leading to relevant comparable data and accuracy. To address this failure, the sixth edition of the WHO manual includes revised basic methods, and a complementary formal standard of the International Standards Organization (ISO23162:2021) for basic semen examination has been published. Perhaps the most significant change in the sixth edition is the reintroduction of the four-category distinction of sperm motility, which causes additional work for laboratories in changing reporting parameters but is clinically important. Another essential change is the widened focus from mainly a prognostic tool for medically assisted reproduction to additionally raising awareness of semen examination as a measure of male reproductive functions and general male health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria
Menkveld, R., Stander, F. S. H., Kotze, T. J. V., Kruger, T. F., & Zyl, J. A. V. (1990) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137150 · Cited by 677
Mortimer, D., Pandya, I. J., & Sawers, R. S. (1986) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0780093 · Cited by 149
Semen analysis with regard to sperm number, sperm morphology and functional aspects
Eliasson, R. (2010) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1038/aja.2008.58 · Cited by 94
Barratt, C. L. R., McLeod, I. D., Dunphy, B. C., & Cooke, I. D. (1992) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137834 · Cited by 37
Cited by
Eisenberg, M. L., Esteves, S. C., Lamb, D. J., Hotaling, J. M., Giwercman, A., Hwang, K., & Cheng, Y.-S. (2023) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00459-w · Cited by 536
The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2024: phenotypes around the world
Gargano, M. A., Matentzoglu, N., Coleman, B., Addo-Lartey, E. B., Anagnostopoulos, A. V., Anderton, J., Avillach, P., Bagley, A. M., Bakštein, E., Balhoff, J. P., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1005 · Cited by 410
Sahraian, K., Abdollahpour Ranjbar, H., Namavar Jahromi, B., Cheung, H. N., Ciarrochi, J., & Habibi Asgarabad, M. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-05411-6 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Björndahl, L., & Kirkman Brown, J.
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 246-251
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205878348
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 33.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.