Cited by 294Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementNanocomposite Films for Food PackagingMeat and Animal Product Quality

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Coating citrus (Murcott tangor) fruit with low molecular weight chitosan increases postharvest quality and shelf life

Chien, Po-Jung, Sheu, Fuu, Lin, Hung-Ren·2007·Food Chemistry

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.10.068

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Allan, 1979, The fungicidal effect of chitosan on fungi of varying cell wall composition, Experimental Mycology, 3, 285, 10.1016/S0147-5975(79)80054-7 · DOI
  2. AOAC (1984). Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists (14th ed.). Washington, DC.
  3. Burdon, 1994, The post-harvest ripening of water stressed banana fruits, The Journal of Horticultural Science, 69, 799, 10.1080/14620316.1994.11516515 · DOI
  4. Chen, 1996, Effect of molecular weight of chitosan with the same degree of deacetylation on the thermal, mechanical, and permeability properties of the prepared membrane, Carbohydrate Polymers, 29, 353, 10.1016/S0144-8617(96)00007-0 · DOI
  5. Du, 1997, Effects of chitosan coating on the storage of peach, Japanese pear, and kiwifruit, Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 66, 15, 10.2503/jjshs.66.15 · DOI
  6. El Ghaouth, 1991, Chitosan coating effect on storability and quality of fresh strawberries, Journal of Food Science, 56, 1618, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb08655.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. El Ghaouth, 1992, Antifungal activity of chitosan on two postharvest pathogens of strawberry fruits, Phytopathology, 82, 398, 10.1094/Phyto-82-398 · DOI
  8. El Ghaouth, 1992, Chitosan coating to extend the storage life of tomatoes, HortScience, 27, 1016, 10.21273/HORTSCI.27.9.1016 · DOI
  9. El Ghaouth, 2000, Enhancement of performance of Candida saitoana by the addition of glycolchitosan for the control of postharvest decay of apple and citrus fruit, Postharvest Biology and Technology, 19, 103, 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00076-4 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Galed, 2004, Application of MRI to monitor the process of ripening and decay in citrus treated with chitosan solutions, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 22, 127, 10.1016/j.mri.2003.05.006 · DOI
  11. Hirano, 1976, Selective N-acetylation of chitosan, Carbohydrate Research, 47, 315, 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)84198-1 · DOI
  12. Hirano, 1990, Chitosan as an ingredient for domestic animal feeds, Journal of Agriculture and Food chemistry, 38, 1214, 10.1021/jf00095a012 · DOI
  13. Ippolito, 2000, Control of postharvest decay of apple fruit by Aureobasidium pullulans and induction of defense responses, Postharvest Biology and Technology, 19, 265, 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00104-6 · DOI
  14. Jeon, 2001, Antimicrobial effect of chitooligosaccharides produced by bioreactor, Carbohydrate Polymers, 44, 71, 10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00200-9 · DOI
  15. Jiang, 2001, Effects of chitosan coating on postharvest life and quality of longan fruit, Food Chemistry, 73, 143, 10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00246-6 · DOI
  16. Muzzarelli, 2002, Natural and artificial chitosan-inorganic composites, Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 92, 89, 10.1016/S0162-0134(02)00486-5 · DOI
  17. No, 2002, Antibacterial activity of chitosans and chitosan olgomers with different molecular weights, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 74, 65, 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00717-6 · DOI
  18. Porat, 2000, Reduction of postharvest decay in organic citrus fruit by a short hot water brushing treatment, Postharvest Biology and Technology, 18, 1175, 10.1016/S0925-5214(99)00065-4 · DOI
  19. Tripathi, 2004, Exploitation of natural products as an alternative strategy to control postharvest fungal rotting of fruit and vegetables, Postharvest Biology and Technology, 32, 235, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Vasyukova, 2001, Modulation of plant resistance to diseases by water-soluble chitosan, Applied biochemistry and Microbiology, 37, 103, 10.1023/A:1002865029994 · DOI
  21. Zhang, 1997, Effects of chitosan coating on enzymatic browning and decay during postharvest storage of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) fruit, Postharvest Biology and Technology, 12, 195, 10.1016/S0925-5214(97)00057-4 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chien, P.-J., Sheu, F., & Lin, H.-R.
Affiliations
  • Yuanpei University (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chien, Po-Jung
Venue
Food Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
1160-1164
ISSN
0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974810650
Cited by
294
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 22
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
Keywords
chitosan coating, low molecular weight chitosan, Murcott tangor, citrus fruit, postharvest quality, shelf life, fruit decay, Penicillium digitatum, Penicillium italicum, antifungal activity, fruit firmness, titratable acidity, vitamin C, cold storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review