The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heavy metal accumulation in vegetables irrigated with water from different sources
Abstract
The present study was carried out to assess levels of different heavy metals like iron, manganese, copper and zinc, in vegetables irrigated with water from different sources. The results indicated a substantial build-up of heavy metals in vegetables irrigated with wastewater. The range of various metals in wastewater-irrigated plants was 116-378, 12-69, 5.2-16.8 and 22-46mg/kg for iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn), respectively. The highest mean levels of Fe and Mn were detected in mint and spinach, whereas the levels of Cu and Zn were highest in carrot. The present study highlights that both adults and children consuming vegetables grown in wastewater-irrigated soils ingest significant amount of these metals. However, the values of these metals were below the recommended maximum tolerable levels proposed by the [Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (1999). Summary and conclusions. In 53rd Meeting, Rome, June 1-10, 1999]. However, the regular monitoring of levels of these metals from effluents and sewage, in vegetables and in other food materials is essential to prevent excessive build-up of these metals in the food chain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Trace element (TE) accumulation is higher in edible parts of leafy vegetables than in grain or fruit crops”
From Assessment of heavy metals accumulation by vegetables irrigated with different stages of textile wastewater for evaluation of food and health risk (2024) · cites this paper as Arora et al., 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phytoremediation of heavy metals—concepts and applications
Ali, H., Khan, E., & Sajad, M. A. (2013) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.075 · Cited by 3,961
Suitability of aromatic plants for phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated areas: a review
Pandey, J., Verma, R. K., & Singh, S. (2019) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2018.1540546 · Cited by 161
Habibollahi, M. H., Karimyan, K., Arfaeinia, H., Mirzaei, N., Safari, Y., Akramipour, R., Sharafi, H., & Fattahi, N. (2019) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9230 · Cited by 133
Hembrom, S., Singh, B., Gupta, S. K., & Nema, A. K. (2020) · Contemporary Environmental Issues and Challenges in Era of Climate Change · doi:10.1007/978-981-32-9595-7_2 · Cited by 130
Mahar, A., Wang, P., Ali, A., Guo, Z., Awasthi, M. K., Lahori, A. H., Wang, Q., Shen, F., Li, R., & Zhang, Z. (2016) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.08.025 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Arora, M., Kiran, B., Rani, S., Rani, A., Kaur, B., & Mittal, N.
- Venue
- Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12-15
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 811-815
- ISSN
- 0308-8146
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review