Measuring the consumer benefits of improving farm animal welfare to inform welfare labelling
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Willingness to pay more for animal welfare standards is higher for women and for consumers with higher level of education and income.
“The willingness to pay more has been found higher for women and for consumers with higher level of education and income (Kehlbacher, Bennett, & Balcome, 2012).”
From Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry (2018) · cites this paper as Kehlbacher et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016 · see citing works
Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud
Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466756 · Cited by 3,947 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Farm animal welfare is a credence good related to the production, transport and slaughter of farm animals that cannot be discerned through inspection of the good before purchase, or through use after purchase (Darby and Karni, 1973).”
Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data
Albert, J. H., & Chib, S. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476321 · Cited by 3,160 · see citing works
Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change
O'Connor, R. E., Bard, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00421.x · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-Pay Space
Train, K. E., & Weeks, M. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3684-1_1 · Cited by 802 · see citing works
Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency
DeShazo, J. R., & Fermo, G. (2002) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.2001.1199 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics
Scarpa, R., & Alberini, A. (2005) · The Economics of non-market goods and resources · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3684-1 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation
Kahneman, D. J., & Sugden, R. (2005) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-005-6032-4 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Scarpa, R., Thiene, M., & Train, K. E. (2008) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01155.x · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Welsh, M., & Poe, G. L. (1998) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1998.1043 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation
Li, C.-Z., & Mattsson, L. (1995) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1995.1017 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Treatment of “Don't-Know” Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model
Wang, H. (1997) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0965 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Alberini, A., Boyle, K., & Welsh, M. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00010-4 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Estimating Willingness to Pay from Survey Data: An Alternative Pre-Test-Market Evaluation Procedure
Cameron, T. A., & James, M. D. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378702400406 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
How Labeling of Safety and Process Attributes Affects Markets for Food
Caswell, J. A. (1998) · Agricultural and Resource Economics Review · doi:10.1017/s106828050000647x · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Farm Animal Welfare, Consumer Willingness to Pay, and Trust: Results of a Cross‐National Survey
Nocella, G., Hubbard, L. J., & Riccardo Scarpa, A. (2010) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppp009 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Lusk, J. L., Nilsson, T. K. H., & Foster, K. (2006) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-006-9039-6 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Swedish Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare and Biotech: A Choice Experiment
Lagerkvist, C. J., Carlsson, F., & Viske, D. (2006) · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: an application to Swedish pig production
Liljenstolpe, C. (2008) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/agr.20147 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Farm animal welfare and food policy
Bennett, R. M. (1997) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/s0306-9192(97)00019-5 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationModel selection for the mixed logit with Bayesian estimation
Balcombe, K., Chalak, A., & Fraser, I. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.06.001 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationBotreau, R., Bonde, M., Butterworth, A., Perny, P., Bracke, M. B. M., Capdeville, J., & Veissier, I. (2007) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731107000535 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Botreau, R., Bracke, M. B. M., Perny, P., Butterworth, A., Capdeville, J., van Reenen, C. G., & Veissier, I. (2007) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731107000547 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Harrison‐Mayfield, L., Bennett, R. M., Tranter, R., & Wooldridge, M. (2020) · International journal of sociology of agriculture and food · doi:10.48416/ijsaf.v15i3.284 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationAttitudes of EU citizens towards Animal Welfare
Wickens, S. (2007) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s0962728600027263 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
THE VALUE OF FARM ANIMAL WELFARE
Bennett, R. M. (1995) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.1995.tb00751.x · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationStatistical Approaches to the Fat Tail Problem for Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation
Ready, R. C., & Hu, D. (1995) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146713 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Estimating Willingness to Pay from Survey Data: An Alternative Pre-Test-Market Evaluation Procedure
Cameron, T. A., & James, M. D. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151386 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Multiple-Bounded Uncertainty Choice Data as Probabilistic Intentions
Evans, M. F., Flores, N. E., & Boyle, K. (2003) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3147299 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Consumer Preferences for Food Product Quality Attributes from Swedish Agriculture
Carlsson, F., Frykblom, P., & Lagerkvist, C. J. (2005) · AMBIO · doi:10.1639/0044-7447(2005)034[0366:cpffpq]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Scarpa, R., Thiene, M., Train, K. E., et al. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.164029 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Perspektiven für ein Europäisches Tierschutzlabel
Deimel, I., Franz, A., Frentrup, M., Spiller, A., Theuvsen, L., & von Meyer-Höfer, M. (2010) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Estimating WTP With Uncertainty Choice Contingent ValuationPreprint
Balcombe, K., Samuel, A., & Fraser, I. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Balcombe, K.G., Chalak, A., Fraser, I., 2009a. Model selection for the Bayesian mixed logit. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 57, 226-237.
- McInerney, J., 1994. Animal welfare: An economic perspective, in: Bennett, R.M. (Ed.), Valuing farm animal welfare, University of Reading, Workshop held at the University of Reading, 30 September 1993. pp. 9-25.
- Veissier, I., Evans, A., 2007. Rationale behind the Welfare Quality R assessment of animal welfare, in: Veissier, I., Forkman, B., Jones, B. (Eds.), Second Welfare Quality R stakeholder conference "Assuring animal welfare: from societal concerns to implementation", 3-4 May 2007, Berlin, Germany.
- Veissier, I., Forkman, B., Jones, B. (Eds.), 2007. Assuring animal welfare: from societal concerns to implementation -Second Welfare Quality R stakeholder conference, Berlin.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry
Santeramo, F. G., Carlucci, D., De Devitiis, B., Seccia, A., Stasi, A., Viscecchia, R., & Nardone, G. (2018) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.039 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kehlbacher, A., Bennett, R., & Balcombe, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Reading (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kehlbacher, A.
- Venue
- Food Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 627-633
- ISSN
- 0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101885514
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 22.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Food Policy (publishedVersion)
- CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
- Keywords
- livestock welfare, consumer preferences, willingness to pay, meat products, welfare standards, market segmentation, EU animal welfare policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
