Cited by 44Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsAgricultural economics and policies

Potential economic impacts of zero thresholds for unapproved GMOs: The EU case

Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas, Kaufman, James, Miller, Douglas·2014·Food Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.06.013

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The global hectarage of GE crops and the number of countries that raise them are expanding.

    “3) the expanding global hectarage of GE crops and the growing number of countries that raise them;”

    From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Kalaitzandonakes et al. (2014)

  • The range of GE crop species being grown and traded is expanding.

    “2) the expanding range of GE crop species being grown and traded;”

    From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Kalaitzandonakes et al. (2014)

  • The pipeline of novel GE crop events, including second-generation crops modified for output traits, is expanding.

    “These include 1) the expanding pipeline of novel GE crop events, including second generation crops modified for output traits;”

    From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Kalaitzandonakes et al. (2014)

  • Under a zero-tolerance policy, trade of relevant commodities between asynchronous countries will likely cease as importing and exporting firms will act to avoid the risk associated with a positive test.

    “Under a zero-tolerance policy, trade of relevant commodities between asynchronous countries will likely cease as importing and exporting firms will act to avoid the risk associated with a positive test (Kalaitzandonakes et al., 2014).”

    From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Kalaitzandonakes et al., 2014

  • Regulatory expertise in many countries is nascent and inexperienced, and these countries will be called on to manage a large number of regulatory submissions for new GE crops in the future.

    “4) the nascent and inexperienced regulatory expertise in many countries that will be called on to manage a large number of regulatory submissions for new GE crops in the future.”

    From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Kalaitzandonakes et al. (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalaitzandonakes, N., Kaufman, J., & Miller, D.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas
Venue
Food Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
45
Pages
146-157
ISSN
0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984281451
Cited by
44
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
trade disruption, soybean imports, spatial equilibrium model, soybean meal, soybean oil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review