The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution
Open accessAbstract
• Uses a choice experiment to study preferences for meat and meat substitutes. • Latent class analysis confirms consumer heterogeneity and identifies six segments in the market. • Consumers with similar meat eating patterns may reduce meat consumption for different reasons. • Most segments preferred attributes commonly associated with meat substitutes. • Recommended interventions include labelling, financial incentives, educational campaigns and new product development. High levels of meat consumption are increasingly being criticised for ethical, environmental, and social reasons. Plant-based meat substitutes have been identified as healthy sources of protein that, in comparison to meat, offer a number of social, environmental and health benefits and may play a role in reducing meat consumption. However, there has been a lack of research on the role they can play in the policy agenda and how specific meat substitute attributes can influence consumers to replace partially replace meat in their diets. In this paper, we examine consumers’ preferences for attributes of meat and meat substitute products and develop consumer segments based on these preferences. The results of a choice experiment with 247 UK consumers, using food labels and mince (ground meat), illustrate that the type of mince, fat content, country of origin and price are major factors that influence choice. Carbon footprint, method of production and brand play a secondary role in determining consumers’ choices of meat/meat substitutes. Latent class analysis is used to identify six consumer segments: price conscious , healthy eaters , taste driven , green , organic and vegetarian consumers which have different socio-demographic characteristics and meat consumption patterns. Future interventions and policies aimed at reducing meat consumption including labelling, provision of more information, financial incentives, educational campaigns and new product development will be more effective if they are holistic and target specific consumer segments, instead of focus on the average consumer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Reed Johnson, F., Lancsar, E., Marshall, D., Kilambi, V., Mühlbacher, A., Regier, D. A., Bresnahan, B. W., Kanninen, B., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223 · Cited by 1,799 · cited 2×
“…does not provide a D-efficiency value for the model, as it assumes that ‘‘designs that are level balanced and near orthogonal will lead to identified preference-model parameters” (Johnson et al., 2013, p.11), the software allows simulations using dummy data to test the integrity of the design.”
BackgroundMethodUse and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries
Grunert, K. G., Fernández-Celemín, L., Wills, J. M., Storcksdieck genannt Bonsmann, S., & Nureeva, L. (2010) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-009-0307-0 · Cited by 400
Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU
Nguyen, T. L. T., Hermansen, J. E., & Mogensen, L. (2010) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.023 · Cited by 298
Cited by
Van Loo, E. J., Hoefkens, C., & Verbeke, W. (2017) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.03.001 · Cited by 292
Cardello, A. V., Llobell, F., Giacalone, D., Roigard, C. M., & Jaeger, S. R. (2022) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104599 · Cited by 191
Wi, G., Bae, J., Kim, H., Cho, Y., & Choi, M.-J. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9040461 · Cited by 141
Michel, F., Knaapila, A., Hartmann, C., & Siegrist, M. (2021) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104195 · Cited by 127
Moons, I., Barbarossa, C., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.012 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Apostolidis, C., & McLeay, F.
- Venue
- Food Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 74-89
- ISSN
- 0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2553943439
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.