Cited by 174Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactMunicipal Solid Waste Management

Greenhouse gas emissions of food waste disposal options for UK retailers

Open access
Moult, J.A., Allan, S.R., Hewitt, C.N., Berners-Lee, M.·2018·Food Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.04.003

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preventing food becoming wasted may be more effective than diverting food that has already been categorised as waste away from landfill and incineration to other waste destinations higher up the food waste hierarchy.

    “It is worth noting that preventing food becoming wasted (e.g. via preventing food waste at source, feeding to other people, etc.) may be more effective than diverting food that has already been categorised as waste away from landfill and incineration to other waste destinations higher up the food waste hierarchy (e.g. composting, anaerobic digestion).”

    From Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions (2019) · cites this paper as Moult et al., 2018

    The results (section labelled “210,” lines 217–229) find that donating edible food mitigates more greenhouse-gas emissions than anaerobic digestion and rank donation above other disposal options. But the paper does not compare preventing waste at source with diverting existing waste, and it finds incineration preferable to composting for some foods. The claim therefore extends beyond its findings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Landfills and composting generate large amounts of greenhouse gases and lead to eutrophication and acidification of ecosystems.

    “For example, landfills and composting generate large amounts of greenhouse gases and lead to the eutrophication and acidification of ecosystems (Arafat et al. 2015;Moult et al. 2018).”

    From Recycling municipal, agricultural and industrial waste into energy, fertilizers, food and construction materials, and economic feasibility: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Moult et al. 2018

    The Introduction describes substantial methane emissions from landfills, and §2.2.4 identifies emissions from composting. But Table 6 reports net emissions of −31 kg CO2e per tonne of food waste for composting, so it does not support describing composting’s net greenhouse-gas emissions as large. The passages do not establish that either option causes ecosystem eutrophication or acidification; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [14]14. European Commission, No 1169/2011. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers.... Official Journal of the European Union, 25 10, Volume 304, p. 18-63. European Commission, No 142/2011. Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 of 25 February 2011. Official Journal of the European Union, 25 02, Volume 54, pp. 1-254.
  2. [15]15. European Commission, No 68/2013. Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 of 16 January 2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials. Official Journal of the European Union, 16 01, Volume 29, pp. 1-64.
  3. [21]21. Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., Bosch, P. R., Dave, R., Meyer, L. A. (Editors)], Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moult, J. A., Allan, S. R., Hewitt, C. N., & Berners-Lee, M.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Berners-Lee, M.
Venue
Food Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
77
Pages
50-58
ISSN
0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800552183
Cited by
174
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 1
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
food waste disposal, greenhouse gas emissions, food retailers, carbon footprint, anaerobic digestion, composting, landfill, incineration, food donation, animal feed, embodied emissions, energy density, waste hierarchy, food waste reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review