CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 134Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsConsumer Packaging Perceptions and TrendsColor perception and design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The drinking experience: Cup or content?

Schifferstein, Hendrik N.J.·2009·Food Quality and Preference
DOI 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.11.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Fluid food products are always consumed from a container: a package, a cup, a bowl, and so on. The properties of this container may affect how the food is experienced. In the present study, we develop a method to study the effects of container properties on the experience of drinking beverages. Participants either evaluated empty cups made from different materials, or they evaluated the experience of drinking hot tea or a chilled softdrink from these cups. In all three conditions, the same set of attributes was used. The results suggest that for many attributes the drinking experience followed the experience of the cups. However, some deviations were also evident. Ratings on the cold-warm item increased when hot tea was consumed from some of the cups, probably related to the increase of the outside temperature of the cup. Differences between conditions for other items (e.g., robust-fragile, strong-weak), however, do not seem to be related to physical changes of the cup and may have a semantic or emotional origin.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.11.003

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–133 of 133

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schifferstein, H. N. J.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Schifferstein, Hendrik N.J.
ORCID
Schifferstein, Hendrik N.J.
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
268-276
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.11.003
OpenAlex
W2036095263
Cited by
134
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Color perception and design
Keywords
drinking experience, food packaging containers, beverage consumption, sensory perception, soft drinks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review