Crossmodal correspondences: Assessing shape symbolism for cheese
Abstract
Several recent studies have demonstrated the existence of robust crossmodal correspondences between food and beverage items and shapes varying on the angular-round continuum. To date, however, the majority of this research has involved relatively simple gustatory, oral-somatosensory, and/or olfactory stimuli. In the present study, therefore, we extended this research in order to investigate whether people also exhibit robust crossmodal correspondences between shapes and cheese. To this end, participants in Experiment 1 (conducted at a Gastronomy event) tasted three aged farmhouse cheeses (Keen’s Cheddar, Tunworth, & Berkswell, from Neal’s Yard Dairy, UK). Participants rated each cheese using a single response scale anchored at either end by a rounded and an angular shape. Significant differences in shape symbolism were observed across the three cheeses. In Experiments 2 (conducted with cheesemongers and cheese experts) and 3 (conducted with customers in a cheese store), participants separately rated the olfactory, gustatory, and oral-somatosensory attributes of different cheeses (Tunworth, Lancashire, and Stawley) on the angular-round continuum. The results revealed that participants’ crossmodal correspondences were based primarily on the taste, rather than the smell or texture of the cheeses. Implications of these findings for the marketing of dairy products are discussed.The results of the present study demonstrate that taste is the leading contributor to the systematic associations consumers have between the flavors of cheese and certain angular/sharp or organic/round shapes and speech sounds, with the same pattern of crossmodal correspondences being held across different tasting groups (non-experts, regular consumers, and cheesemongers/experts). These results provide insights regarding the abstract imagery that might best be associated with specific taste attributes in commercial cheeses. These results may also be used to not only develop abstract imagery for product packaging that can capture specific shape/sound symbolic properties, but also to develop descriptors that can provide a common ground on which to talk about cheeses, thereby improving communication between different panels of cheese tasters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People associate round shapes with sweetness, whereas angular shapes tend to be associated with sourness, saltiness, and bitterness.
“People associate round shapes with sweetness, whereas angular shapes tend to be associated with sourness, saltiness, and bitterness instead [62-65].”
From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [64]
Cites
Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review
Spence, C. (2011) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7 · Cited by 1,618 · see citing works
Self-citationDELIZA, R., & MacFIE, H. J. H. (1996) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.1996.tb00036.x · Cited by 763 · see citing works
The multisensory perception of flavor
Auvray, M., & Spence, C. (2008) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.005 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of expectancy in sensory and hedonic evaluation: The case of smoked salmon ice-cream
Yeomans, M. R., Chambers, L., Blumenthal, H., & Blake, A. (2008) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.02.009 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Velasco, C., Woods, A. T., Petit, O., Cheok, A. D., & Spence, C. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.005 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Assessing the shape symbolism of the taste, flavour, and texture of foods and beverages
Spence, C., & Ngo, M. K. (2012) · Flavour · doi:10.1186/2044-7248-1-12 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citation“See me, feel me”: Effects of 3D-printed surface patterns on beverage evaluation
van Rompay, T. J. L., Finger, F., Saakes, D., & Fenko, A. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.12.002 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Spence, C., Ngo, M. K., Percival, B., & Smith, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ngo, Mary Kim
- Venue
- Food Quality and Preference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 206-212
- ISSN
- 0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057889194
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/K503393/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Culinary Culture and Tourism
- Keywords
- cross-modal correspondence, cheese, taste perception, cheese texture, cheese aroma, cheese marketing, dairy packaging, consumer perception, abstract imagery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review