Cited by 70Consumer Packaging Perceptions and TrendsSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsConsumer Retail Behavior Studies

“See me, feel me”: Effects of 3D-printed surface patterns on beverage evaluation

Open access
van Rompay, Thomas J.L., Finger, Friederike, Saakes, Daniel, Fenko, Anna·2017·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

Research shows that packaging appearance can have a strong impact on taste experience and product evaluation. However, so far research has mainly focused on how visual appearances may steer sensory impressions including smell and taste. Taking into account new (technological) developments which allow for consideration of a wide range of previously unexplored packaging factors, the research presented here investigates the impact of 3D-printed surface patterns on taste evaluations as a function of product type (a bitter tasting coffee versus a sweet tasting chocolate drink) and verbal product claims (either stressing taste strength or taste softness). To this end, 3D-printed cups with angular and rounded surface patterns were manufactured and handed to shoppers participating in a taste session for a fictitious coffee or chocolate brand. Results show that an angular surface pattern increased perceived bitterness and taste intensity ratings, whereas a rounded surface pattern induced a sweeter taste evaluation and a less intense taste experience. Congruent pairings of drinks and tactile patterns resulted in more favorable outcomes. Finally, congruence was also found to be important with respect to taste descriptions, with verbal claims in line with surface pattern associations further enhancing product experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.12.002

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hot chocolate and coffee tasted from a cup with a rounded macrogeometric outer surface pattern are rated as sweeter and less intense than from a cup with an angular outer pattern.

    “hot chocolate and co ee tasted from a cup with a rounded macrogeometric outer surface pattern were rated as tasting sweeter and less intense than the same beverages when tasted from a cup that had a much more angular outer pattern instead.”

    From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [47]

    Section 4.1 reports that the rounded pattern made the beverages taste sweeter regardless of drink type. Section 4.2 reports lower intensity with the rounded pattern for coffee, but not a significant difference for hot chocolate (p = 0.53). The claim overextends the intensity finding to both beverages; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Taste and hedonic evaluation of food and beverages can be influenced by the surface texture of packaging materials, servingware, and the food itself.

    “the taste and hedonic evaluation of food and beverages can indeed be influenced by the surface texture of packaging materials [59,132], servingware [46,47] and even the food itself [133].”
  • An angular surface pattern increases perceived bitterness and taste intensity compared to a rounded pattern.

    “Conversely, the angular surface pattern increased perceived bitterness and taste intensity when compared to the rounded pattern.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Spence, C. (2016). Multisensory packaging design: Color, shape, pattern, sound, and smell. In P. Burgess (Ed.), Integrating the packaging and product experience in food and beverages: A road-map to consumer satisfaction (pp. 1-22). USA: Woodhead Publishing.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Rompay, T. J. L., Finger, F., Saakes, D., & Fenko, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
62
Pages
332-339
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2562730304
Cited by
70
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 3
FWCI
22.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Keywords
surface patterns, tactile cues, taste perception, coffee, chocolate drink, bitterness, taste intensity, congruences, sensory experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review