Cited by 18Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorDiabetes Treatment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characteristics and food consumption for current, previous, and potential consumers of GLP-1 s

Open access
Dilley, Andrew, Adhikari, Saroj, Silwal, Pratikshya, L. Lusk, Jayson., McFadden, Brandon R.·2025·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

Widespread adoption of Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists could cause significant changes in food consumption and preferences that disrupt the food industry. In this study, we survey four consumer groups to better understand how GLP-1 s may affect food consumption and preferences. The four groups were: 1) consumers currently using a GLP-1, 2) consumers who have previously used a GLP-1, 3) consumers who haven't used a GLP-1 but plan to in the future, and 4) consumers who haven't used a GLP-1 and don't plan to in the future. Results show that consumers currently taking a GLP-1 consume significantly fewer calories than the other groups surveyed, and calorie reduction while taking a GLP-1 for weight loss could be around 720 to 990 cal. Additionally, those taking GLP-1 s most likely reduce consumption of processed foods, sugar-sweetened beverages, refined grains, and beef. The results of this study will inform potential consumers and food companies of valuable insights into the broader effects of GLP-1 s on caloric intake and food preferences. • The consumer market for Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists is significant. • We surveyed four consumer groups, including those who had or are taking a GLP-1. • Gender, household size, and education were associated with GLP-1 use and interest. • Intake recall suggests that GLP-1 users reduce consumption more than 700 cal. • GLP-1 users reduced consumption of processed foods, soda, refined grains, and beef.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105507

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

2 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jain, 2023, Trends shaping the health economy: Value for money, Trilliant Health, 2023, 41
  2. Tirrell, 2024, At least 25,000 people in the US are starting weight-loss drug Wegovy each week, drugmaker says, CNN Health

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Dilley, A., Adhikari, S., Silwal, P., L. Lusk, J., & McFadden, B. R.
Corresponding author
McFadden, Brandon R.
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-08
Volume
129
Pages
105507
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408392848
Cited by
18
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7
FWCI
10.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, dietary intake, food preferences, weight loss, energy intake, processed foods, sugar-sweetened beverages, refined grains, beef consumption, consumer characteristics, dietary behavior change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review