The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making sense of the “clean label” trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications
Open accessAbstract
Consumers in industrialized countries are nowadays much more interested in information about the production methods and components of the food products that they eat, than they had been 50years ago. Some production methods are perceived as less "natural" (i.e. conventional agriculture) while some food components are seen as "unhealthy" and "unfamiliar" (i.e. artificial additives). This phenomenon, often referred to as the "clean label" trend, has driven the food industry to communicate whether a certain ingredient or additive is not present or if the food has been produced using a more "natural" production method (i.e. organic agriculture). However, so far there is no common and objective definition of clean label. This review paper aims to fill the gap via three main objectives, which are to a) develop and suggest a definition that integrates various understandings of clean label into one single definition, b) identify the factors that drive consumers' choices through a review of recent studies on consumer perception of various food categories understood as clean label with the focus on organic, natural and 'free from' artificial additives/ingredients food products and c) discuss implications of the consumer demand for clean label food products for food manufacturers as well as policy makers. We suggest to define clean label, both in a broad sense, where consumers evaluate the cleanliness of product by assumption and through inference looking at the front-of-pack label and in a strict sense, where consumers evaluate the cleanliness of product by inspection and through inference looking at the back-of-pack label. Results show that while 'health' is a major consumer motive, a broad diversity of drivers influence the clean label trend with particular relevance of intrinsic or extrinsic product characteristics and socio-cultural factors. However, 'free from' artificial additives/ingredients food products tend to differ from organic and natural products. Food manufacturers should take the diversity of these drivers into account in developing new products and communication about the latter. For policy makers, it is important to work towards a more homogenous understanding and application of the term of clean label and identify a uniform definition or regulation for 'free from' artificial additives/ingredients food products, as well as work towards decreasing consumer misconceptions. Finally, multiple future research avenues are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Food consumption trends and drivers
Kearney, J. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0149 · Cited by 1,987
Frewer, L. J., Bergmann, K., Brennan, M., Lion, R., Meertens, R., Rowe, G., Siegrist, M., & Vereijken, C. (2011) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2011.05.005 · Cited by 424 · cited 2×
“In addition, they need to regain greater consumer trust in regulations and food production processes (Frewer et al., 2011) in response to the factors underlying the clean label trend.”
Backgroundvan Kleef, E., van Trijp, H. C. M., & Luning, P. (2005) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2005.01.009 · Cited by 395
Processed foods: Contributions to nutrition
Weaver, C. M., Dwyer, J., Fulgoni, V. L., King, J. C., Leveille, G. A., MacDonald, R. S., Ordovas, J., & Schnakenberg, D. (2014) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.089284 · Cited by 347
Judging a product by its cover: Packaging sustainability and perceptions of quality in food products
Magnier, L., Schoormans, J., & Mugge, R. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.006 · Cited by 295
Marian, L., Chrysochou, P., Krystallis, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.05.001 · Cited by 237
Consumer Led Food Product Development
(2007) · doi:10.1201/9781439823903 · Cited by 223
McFadden, J. R., & Huffman, W. E. (2017) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.02.007 · Cited by 202
Cited by
Trends in Microalgae Incorporation Into Innovative Food Products With Potential Health Benefits
Caporgno, M. P., & Mathys, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2018.00058 · Cited by 639
Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production
Rubio, N. R., Xiang, N., & Kaplan, D. L. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20061-y · Cited by 606
An investigation of the formulation and nutritional composition of modern meat analogue products
Bohrer, B. M. (2019) · Food Science and Human Wellness · doi:10.1016/j.fshw.2019.11.006 · Cited by 593
Jurášková, D., Ribeiro, S. C., & Silva, C. C. G. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11020156 · Cited by 342
Voidarou, C., Antoniadou, Μ., Rozos, G., Tzora, A., Skoufos, I., Varzakas, T., Lagiou, A., & Bezirtzoglou, E. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10010069 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Asioli, D., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Caputo, V., Vecchio, R., Annunziata, A., Næs, T., & Varela, P.
- Venue
- Food Research International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- Pt 1
- Pages
- 58-71
- ISSN
- 0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2735384582
- Cited by
- 1,127
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 55.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making sense of the “clean label” trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.022
- The paper
- Asioli, D., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Caputo, V., Vecchio, R., Annunziata, A., Næs, T., & Varela, P. (2017). Making sense of the “clean label” trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications. Food Research International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.