Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Encapsulated probiotic cells: Relevant techniques, natural sources as encapsulating materials and food applications – A narrative review

Open access
Rodrigues, F.J., Cedran, M.F., Bicas, J.L., Sato, H.H.·2020·Food Research International

Abstract

The administration of probiotic microorganisms in adequate amounts is constantly related to health benefits. To promote beneficial effects, these microorganisms must not be affected by exposure to environmental factors and must be able to adhere and colonize the human gastrointestinal tract. Several encapsulation techniques and encapsulating materials are available to produce probiotic particles, however, it is essential that the process must not be aggressive, reducing or preventing injuries and cell losses, besides, the particle properties obtained must be adequate for the proposed purpose. At the same time, the global market for supplements and probiotic foods has been growing significantly, and cell encapsulation appears as an alternative to incorporate probiotics into different food matrices. This review discusses and updates the main techniques, and the traditional and emerging polysaccharides for encapsulation of probiotic cells, as well as the advantages and possibilities of incorporating produced particles into food matrices. Currently, various scientific studies report the use of different encapsulation techniques, such as extrusion, emulsion, spray drying, spray chilling and fluidized bed to encapsulate probiotics properly. The alginate is still widely used to produce probiotic particles, however, there has been a growing interest in its total or partial substitution with others polysaccharides, such as gums, mucilages, prebiotic compounds and microbial exopolysaccharides, which improve the protection and survival of encapsulated cells and allow their incorporation into dairy and non-dairy food products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109682

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 161 references

Metadata

Authors
Rodrigues, F. J., Cedran, M. F., Bicas, J. L., & Sato, H. H.
Venue
Food Research International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
137
Pages
109682
ISSN
0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3088993369
Cited by
303
References
161
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Encapsulated probiotic cells: Relevant techniques, natural sources as encapsulating materials and food applications – A narrative review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109682
The paper
Rodrigues, F. J., Cedran, M. F., Bicas, J. L., & Sato, H. H. (2020). Encapsulated probiotic cells: Relevant techniques, natural sources as encapsulating materials and food applications – A narrative review. Food Research International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109682

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.