Cited by 291Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementForest Management and Policy

Increasing trends in high-severity fire in the southwestern USA from 1984 to 2015

Open access
Singleton, Megan P., Thode, Andrea E., Sánchez Meador, Andrew J., Iniguez, Jose M.·2019·Forest Ecology and Management

Abstract

In the last three decades, over 4.1 million hectares have burned in Arizona and New Mexico and the largest fires in documented history have occurred in the past two decades. Changes in burn severity over time, however, have not been well documented in forest and woodland ecosystems in the southwestern US. Using remotely sensed burn severity data from 1621 fires (>404 ha), we assessed trends from 1984 to 2015 in Arizona and New Mexico in (1) number of fires and total area burned in all vegetation types; (2) area burned, area of high-severity, and percent of high-severity fire in all forest and woodland areas; and (3) area burned, area of high-severity, and percent of high-severity in seven different grouped forest and woodland vegetation types (Ecological Response Unit [ERU] Fire Regime Types). Number of fires and area burned increased across the Southwest regardless of vegetation type. The significant increasing trends held for area burned, area of high-severity, and percent of high-severity fire in all forest and woodland ecosystems. Area burned and area burned severely increased in all seven ERU Fire Regime Types while percent of high-severity fire increased in two ERUs: Mixed Conifer Frequent Fire and Mixed Conifer with Aspen/Spruce Fir. Managers must face the implications of increasing, uncharacteristic high-severity fire in many ecosystems as climate change and human pressures continue to affect fire regimes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.11.039

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singleton, M. P., Thode, A. E., Sánchez Meador, A. J., & Iniguez, J. M.
Affiliations
Northern Arizona University (US)
Corresponding author
Singleton, Megan P.
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
433
Pages
709-719
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903732168
Cited by
291
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 16
FWCI
12.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Forest Ecology and Management (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
high-severity fire, fire trends, burn severity, burned area, fire regime change, climate change, anthropogenic pressure, southwestern United States, Arizona, New Mexico

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review