Cited by 56Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisPsychedelics and Drug StudiesAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

Forensic analysis of hallucinogenic mushrooms and khat (Catha edulisForsk) using cation-exchange liquid chromatography.

Laussmann, Tim, Meier-Giebing, Sigrid·2010·Forensic Science International

Abstract

Hallucinogenic mushrooms (e.g. Psilocybe and Panaeolus species) as well as leaves and young shoots of the khat tree (Catha edulis Forsk) are illicit drugs in many countries. The exact concentration of the hallucinogenic alkaloids psilocin and psilocybin in mushrooms and the sympathomimetic alkaloids cathinone and cathine in khat is usually essential for jurisdiction. Facing an increasing number of mushroom and khat seizures by German customs authorities, a convenient comprehensive quantitative HPLC method based on cation-exchange liquid chromatography for these rather "exotic" drugs has been developed which avoids time-consuming multi-step sample preparation or chemical derivatization procedures. Using this method a number of different hallucinogenic fungi species and products that are mainly distributed via the internet have been analysed (dried and fresh Psilocybe cubensis Singer as well as P. cubensis collected from "grow boxes", Panaeolus cyanescens Berkeley and Broome and so-called "philosopher stones" (sclerotia of Psilocybe species)). Highest total amounts of psilocin have been detected in dried P. cyanescens reaching up to 3.00+/-0.24 mg per 100 mg. The distribution of khat alkaloids in different parts of the khat shoots has been studied. High concentrations of cathinone have not only been detected in leaves but also in green parts and barks of stalks. Additionally, the sample treatment for fresh mushroom and khat samples has been optimised. Highest amounts of alkaloids were found when fresh material was freeze-dried.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.013

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laussmann, T., & Meier-Giebing, S.
Corresponding author
Laussmann, Tim
Venue
Forensic Science International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
195
Issue
1-3
Pages
160-164
ISSN
0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067074477
Cited by
56
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forensic Science International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Keywords
hallucinogenic mushrooms, khat, psilocybin, psilocin, cathinone, cathine, Psilocybe cubensis, philosopher's stone, sclerotia, illicit drug analysis, drug seizures, sample preparation, freeze-drying
MeSH terms
Agaricales, Alkaloids, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Chromatography, Liquid, Desiccation, Freeze Drying, Hallucinogens, Phenylpropanolamine, Psilocybin, Illicit Drugs, Plant Structures, Catha, Forensic Toxicology, Limit of Detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review